From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 262d0c6: Mark some tests as expensive Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 15:34:23 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20200910182904.20559.25935@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200910182905.F0E4520A2E@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <877dt0is0p.fsf@gmx.de> <87pn6rgtcl.fsf@gmx.de> <87363f9y0f.fsf@gmx.de> <87k0vmxubv.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32917"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 19 17:35:52 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kUXCR-0008Qs-Uo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 17:35:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51800 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUXCR-0005xf-13 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:35:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46768) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUXB5-0004c7-7z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:34:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-f54.google.com ([209.85.208.54]:36802) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUXB3-0005XF-D4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:34:26 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-f54.google.com with SMTP id l16so10745436eds.3 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:34:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0vHnVNof/L0p/i3WkXcJwbmvkVRIcA2RcxE2cc55IdA=; b=Q+xbO+/yb7pErLKGF6+DmcMcvsLH9BgE0SimxQtO0pyoZAvYS2yWfDx6WiD9tmNKS3 fyRvot5esv8OApdZuRsalM9Ab49a3Ay50KRi2bzco0xo+fqpeU4fYbe3eT+qTCuCTuKS 4JS47n7UpaW68z0LkQC9GiR0EuWCVo4CehVIqXTCTAGrCZb7bp3/WMx+Yy/U6R9eazRl Vk93j0bzW62Xmjk2gVdR1y20tHeriltOh5Bx2EEzGjVr3B3IGUpLtXNrKvHj+LoqeELc qQMrFdHHdZ9hhxZ9oP/8GfCrFbrji9sw8liRCSITjp9VYQuxc7OVgMEkv5aS9cYXr/EG +htg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533q+UY+6A97yy6v+z+NmP2oWt8unZDz7e1QJruBPWkHRs6NNDRG vBMdjyvCYty2jmY/iSjoavTpOP1aIij3hCN9zug= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxh+xYjV33SA7Lj0Rio4e5mkFcqJZrIT8Q6UynIQlbhj28/cuuTpEpJ6S8eGj8J7WMhnQZNfyUxff5bDbUNsGw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3133:: with SMTP id dd19mr415931edb.100.1603121663844; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:34:23 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 15:34:23 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87k0vmxubv.fsf@gmx.de> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.208.54; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-f54.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/19 11:34:24 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:258125 Archived-At: Michael Albinus writes: >> Everything works fine here, but I don't know if any of this would cause >> any problems elsewhere. One idea is to just push it and see what >> breaks, and then adapt accordingly. >> >> Please let me know what you think. > > Yes, let's go this way. Maybe there will be problems in the remote case, > but this we could adapt later on. OK! I've re-indented the code (due to the new macro) and pushed it to master as commit 1a32809d2b. >> * test/lisp/autorevert-tests.el (auto-revert--timeout): Make into >> defun and shorten timeout by a factor 10. > > Why is it a defun now? Likely, I have overseen the reason ... It's just to have a different value when auto-revert-interval is let-bound (as in the `with-auto-revert-test' macro). But we don't use this macro in all the tests.