From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gitlab Migration Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 17:44:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83tujbqg4j.fsf@gnu.org> <46353190-1190-495f-b15e-22980159b3ab@yandex.ru> <83y28mp0rb.fsf@gnu.org> <51a363db-fde7-791d-cf8d-98ac601d62ee@yandex.ru> <57ca4d78-2339-201d-edce-678c9b003a99@yandex.ru> <01341bd6-b94b-4f94-1461-405e723142ad@yandex.ru> <8735qmjklm.fsf@localhost> <87ilzi86h7.fsf@posteo.net> <875yvh9anq.fsf@posteo.net> <83o899yjh2.fsf@gnu.org> <4b5d82b5-4599-6598-cf4a-5d0076a8abf0@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36924"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Emacs developers To: Daniel Fleischer Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 04 17:47:01 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mMXsj-0009Td-LE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 17:47:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51440 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMXsi-0007pF-9l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 11:47:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45294) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMXq7-0004jU-GF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 11:44:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pg1-f176.google.com ([209.85.215.176]:39933) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMXq4-0005uw-Kx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 11:44:18 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pg1-f176.google.com with SMTP id g184so2107357pgc.6 for ; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 08:44:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TxW5toKfft1rrdxXnlIitV4i8Zpn2KycHa2plIpC5CI=; b=MMjbOd3IkqI4pDtxQ5NVnhDRzkEQcnDyabHeyWvfcG+4HQksql63lw7AugbqLpWt1M QQKBdYxIhICuOsFHZml0q6CFuQYh3DVxyE7VcxwEPCtpmmwi2EJvIBIbtR1ahTTYzg8c YLVssDJ3P8b62tlxlP8mfk9Eg/E/xHLVXn2tV17JpcvZREkgoQGpEjsBfSijeWT3fU39 kLzfo6GCIMulHPopRGpwyiJGcKOxHW1Zqpf34H2wmFWXWfmmQpGg+IxVn52W2U1NNmbu 47fPaJ0VrDk8g4WPBnCfTKm+cktr4Zc/QMgULjTaDSUkfMiIkGGqnu6Xcqq/sfSu8AYR 9n1w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531MwgL6GZlPy6X295wA3tlj0I+1kaLLqopAAllpYetSWtQzwF0T Vd6XVvQ5RoCqzI4GrAQA5f0MEZ5rkzQaYFRKjdM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzWcR7aD4vkcsPnobVpzl/DiZeVKCadvXAYhHT1WR0TJm7jlV704aYtbJlN41/phEdyh5pck/6Enc5K5yLWGK4= X-Received: by 2002:a63:2243:: with SMTP id t3mr4002539pgm.114.1630770254754; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 08:44:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.215.176; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pg1-f176.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273908 Archived-At: Daniel Fleischer writes: > > Another popular option is Intellij IDEA (no word-wrap by default either, as far as I can see). Neither does Atom. > > So it looks like for programming the default is no word-wrap. So there should be a hook turning wrapping off in `prog-mode', right?