From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master baf331e 3/3: Rename replace-in-string to string-replace Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:22:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20200926222500.20662.9159@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200926222503.227F720441@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87sgb1gb3l.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10657"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Robert Pluim , Emacs developers To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 29 15:25:07 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kNFcx-0002X8-4O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:25:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52020 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNFcw-0000Gd-5L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 09:25:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36644) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNFaE-0006w2-Qj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 09:22:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-f49.google.com ([209.85.218.49]:34622) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNFaC-0006xt-SB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 09:22:18 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-f49.google.com with SMTP id gr14so15039709ejb.1 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 06:22:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7ENVe8GBwCIDujzgDkIy1sODcD0CtdIpUgQdWsDDrnI=; b=n5X9JAQh0ksCwx3MKMa6hjvvM5H/0S78ThxKLWBVXcVBwU8YghN9NlqyK0dXg9nuLA mg5Qc5+uvC8IWlSNWkYo41PG85w3WhacMuwOhLW1I0qxAItwp3dXg4qLsNRA0dzW9p0V Scjxv4eu4AvSXAZmMwxOQNAd9IYi9dMLwtmrAMAQNm+gULgRjGnere6+z00v64T19/0P km8kybALRLZ5acHPVh/GtCA+Qe+UKhRWWmf0vfIAPqUnTQcdz6F9h87WiaE0mGIL/Ax+ OjSIWRutNTkpc8pRFc0GJ/V4HT155p6Y+DBCGcDHcOB5O6FhJ3YJY3gISTaW5rB+z2GL +pNw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530QxBCCtKo+n2e+xYHjOPGVtORfcCfMjg3/k3z3f8i2pIP5vCx3 3S+mB7Ch/FBQxjl6IW3OYjWlVFAKO5cw6rzwxIA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJybxljsms4IP9PrxKnTJpw8C/ykHsOpY+/lxJug+CtLXYY+jdA4dVE5YlB1yYzpXUF+2GEntcZiWSjazncS0HM= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:16c8:: with SMTP id t8mr3949078ejd.272.1601385734891; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 06:22:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87sgb1gb3l.fsf@gnus.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.218.49; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-f49.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/29 09:22:15 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.199, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:256690 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > Or (define-obsolete-function-alias 'replace-regexp-in-string > > #'string-replace-regexp "28.1") > > I sympathise with the impulse, because `replace-regexp-in-string' is > probably the most awkward of the commonly used function names, in my > extremely, super-duper, incredibly humble opinion (nobody has humbler > opinions than I do, everybody knows that). > > But I don't think the churn would be worth it. Yeah, that's true. The suggestion is probably a bit too enthusiastic.