From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "Why is emacs so square?" Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:36:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8wXYP4GY9hwW-9mYv6_LGMETZ8Vz3Ob1Bec6yh6kPT7yxjTkxA3V6dXY4ELra9tYiJUxJmgXKSIEX4w8HFiPRoeGVSQHDSoBVy1voj1e3Qo=@protonmail.com> <833694f29y.fsf@gnu.org> <4amRIW9fznS6sa3th4xPABzua9LQDlNPeIFxVsGYdq_wsg4-Ea1l9sEP-T6QrnO5QMV3jhgrnAspk2mSIC7COlodqr04koAcIPYPLLmPHFM=@protonmail.com> <83imhzecc5.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2qvcjv6.fsf@gnu.org> <83k12ed20s.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="34597"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: yandros@gmail.com, Emacs developers , Dmitry Gutov , Richard Stallman , ndame To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 17 09:37:43 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jPLZF-0008q1-V9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:37:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43400 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jPLZF-00012d-13 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 03:37:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39671) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jPLY8-0008WB-2y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 03:36:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jPLY6-0001Se-3z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 03:36:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yb1-f193.google.com ([209.85.219.193]:34666) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jPLY4-0001Qk-QX; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 03:36:28 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yb1-f193.google.com with SMTP id l84so577814ybb.1; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 00:36:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gJ2TmA22wsj8YgZb0Ju+BkH7GncqTirg3r6qj3bbZHM=; b=SkXMIi0IuO+2xBVjpbnhhPZphknsCH8TpDS400gpRCxRBEr3mcVTzymX8Z2P9bk+Zd IxsBFOgvrE1LlGCVN7jYAJzupYdYIj23lu9DaJq9mA+wd6hn13p10UH1mbcTL0KR07vt TGbrZrTM+ag2q5YyrIpJyO7fD9srDwd75+v2acY0ahr2gkSBtrPlhVFU4OfBHnT6W5++ /G+3C662YaiAi+vZFBrSJp0ewm+lhm/rjS0vNKgl4YYDY5JFCAEjwZy6j3YVKjvfPJKx wZGYyWzsWE2/xyicDnIVoZUag2I8DkDdAJcCYPPpcZTsPMVWpfgYRGKa8qoiB9Lx/nrT FczA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaArDV318EXR9K/IJ4hqxCCtP0ecTb3kAqDlktz2KVX25Ag93UC B8hoDJoYLFV5+TfcIWa5brXEnGk/+6nswpyz4NETLXfR X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIobeKNrzd4mPE0rUYJ3BjnLJUEbRjfsn4CpLJs3uXt4Qj7L70y4zbgp+uovb4p6NxB1hamY4+ibhVqnqq29+o= X-Received: by 2002:a25:492:: with SMTP id 140mr3758199ybe.466.1587108987536; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 00:36:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83k12ed20s.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.219.193 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:247156 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Someone=E2=84=A2 needs to invest the time and effort to figure out the le= gal > issues, find the icons that we want out of those which are legally > fit, and post the resulting information. We did that process at the > time (AFAIR, quite a few of our icons come from Gnome/GTK), and it > wasn't easy. > > Alternatively, someone could create our own icons, in which case they > could be even prettier than the ones pointed out here. Would it make sense to add an entry about this to the TODO file? Best regards, Stefan Kangas