From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: native-comp-async-report-warnings-errors default value Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 10:14:43 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87h7dj7su7.fsf@gmail.com> <83r1cnlu6y.fsf@gnu.org> <87czo77rx7.fsf@gmail.com> <837dcmamt2.fsf@gnu.org> <83v90694ka.fsf@gnu.org> <83v901zdh6.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12629"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 17 19:17:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1myHn4-0002yb-0S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 19:17:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45490 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1myHn2-0008D2-8w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 13:17:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40578) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1myHkm-0005AY-9w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 13:14:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e] (port=46951 helo=mail-pj1-x102e.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1myHkk-0000hi-Vg; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 13:14:48 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-x102e.google.com with SMTP id np6-20020a17090b4c4600b001a90b011e06so3567367pjb.5; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 10:14:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iU3W2WiHynAFvhgY/u0OGF0j3KatDbMST6OWS/hH8Jo=; b=K763qfMXwr7G9vfBlu5m5sG8ig9oLuwxROP/qNMvJx90DHCBk82J6c1owgqvQDqTwL OwWSZJ679uMAk0XPIAyLpcJIkZSgcOCblA4Dy7K0ZfcAC+AKlfhfr2/o0ELBVhwSblyr 2Nl8vUJWsyRWB5APSsGzR4Pv4Xy6yuZKKWCMmqrtXpCWEDtHbgcnsxYkYa945WnrvbZC 6aHSAMtUz75iBmgDpSomy4gWXdCW1uzImv4ssfsge6xB1iXromuiNyMKHRFDo23iWoCw udzre1k87VX1ayBclucy/2KTwXoMya+zGo6EporLPY5uwfbqI2VXVaYgilBfyo5rU37x zIpw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iU3W2WiHynAFvhgY/u0OGF0j3KatDbMST6OWS/hH8Jo=; b=Kuoa1oaG3qpP9q5rMYRHLiwJ3j8aaToakrDsOxVd3p/CBNUE/eyPAYkUdu2XukPHDI QkS7JQuNrXZNTdKvyQcQso04x52B4nmn9fw0t9pBncOhAzrW8alPvslo+uAaCcfdELVy jzVW2AFKWHEy1j0DbFyLj9di2BYcV/YwdtvJECksiVubbX2SOML5znDMTxna//wQiT1c MzEx2ehmxm71t+4xnPfbKdn/Ksch1c0bO9H7LkpF1mt2EBSIM3r+RK/ZpG0I2YtY4DDj 53cTxD8hHGGHwJ2fTZAuJKMCS/2LzSUULz4HxJ4voQPp/N0KvQ8V2pji3Vf7WtRpL6Gt /OYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530V3W4klrINI41wHs9O/+CNYEnREaOXVbSbD3XRPbrlIVx9TfFO Oz0vRn+7mWSnSTRkb0PqwkONsR26RhxlDn9hWQ7bkXKT X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJygCViBpkYBbmvDVVCpStUbHgzfkrM+P1UlLd78Wp5P5evTbcJ6B59hd4EOD5bCEHtiJdjUDCzW7zR3uFJ+STo= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:1bc5:: with SMTP id r5mr5104430pjr.133.1639764883964; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 10:14:43 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 10:14:43 -0800 In-Reply-To: <83v901zdh6.fsf@gnu.org> X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pj1-x102e.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:282226 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Then flip it. For yourself. Why decide for all the others? I have been reluctant to do that, as that would stop me from testing how it works by default. > But if "by popular demand" and other pressure, you will decide to > disable the warnings nonetheless, I won't mount the barricades. My > opinion about this is unchanged, but feel free to disregard it. I just recompiled, and I'm sitting again with mostly unusable Emacs for the last 5-10 minutes or so. Warnings popping up in the middle of searches and trying to get things done. For example, while writing this email, I was helpfully informed (among other things) that: Warning (comp): yasnippet.el:477:1: Warning: defvar `yas-after-exit-snippet-hook' docstring wider than 80 characters Disable showing Disable logging I find the current situation untenable, especially if we expect some high profile GNU/Linux distributions to be shipping --with-native-compilation by default. Unless there is a specific request not to do that from the maintainers, I intend to flip the default to `silent' on emacs-28 in the next couple of days. If there is such a request, I will not insist further. Thanks in advance.