From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Current mode command discovery Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:52:08 -0600 Message-ID: References: <87v9aubm96.fsf@gnus.org> <83a6s6bkrg.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtw6bkjo.fsf@gnus.org> <838s7qbjn2.fsf@gnu.org> <87eehi820x.fsf@gnus.org> <83v9at9xel.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnv8xlqa.fsf@gnus.org> <838s7o9g90.fsf@gnu.org> <87im6revhq.fsf@tcd.ie> <83im6r98qd.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0r7uade.fsf@gnus.org> <83eehf978r.fsf@gnu.org> <87ft1vu9hd.fsf@gnus.org> <838s7n95pf.fsf@gnu.org> <8735xvu7sx.fsf@gnus.org> <834kib94ha.fsf@gnu.org> <874kibh9mu.fsf@telefonica.net> <83o8gi7lh2.fsf@gnu.org> <871rdebmmh.fsf@telefonica.net> <831rdc4epn.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23548"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 19 16:40:23 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lD7tH-000623-9O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:40:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54878 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD7tG-0000yd-85 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:40:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35884) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD78g-0007Xr-BV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 09:52:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-x102e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e]:34739) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD78c-0005iH-JF; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 09:52:14 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-x102e.google.com with SMTP id my11so4346750pjb.1; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 06:52:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=i/zyPliuaz0+65OhsFH3r+1Si26tMtFk7/HfdK7ZfgI=; b=KnveqvmQkYfu0MHkR/Zwi3ofkoDAmdKzwU3WkqWG3M2RABlvvu5/Q3Wi8jyyGtcin7 GDCppDqdIGfuX9T2FEzznAHDL4mp7+by5ygVCdTibyPTSfjqEL5xibDZZlFsjpNVBHpY l2uhzjmnTiqFEyiiDFOkfRBmQXaZyelLHBybF+hZlLjS0540aEIY6UytIff+IbLqpPDd P9ROjn89QaV3Zf+9wHhKc9Jz66yMQKA+gYNu8ExcUugcgBfl2qHE40PdTM0TylQ7tluL 89IPFbEqvGs4aBeZPZNXjO5Kf22jWfx/2WPQXUdTEiUvvBb0Np7UMo9DFx2evVYnl0xv s3Uw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=i/zyPliuaz0+65OhsFH3r+1Si26tMtFk7/HfdK7ZfgI=; b=IA9P0MGURcnSCfMz1ge1peDy304D9vH4uSP8NIjR1N88qcarjVGvQEaMNCxyg8wLmk YIiHCOTzIf4jSmTWShObik999PKyCTs+z8VSzyxTnpuNFd2ymz9qsbDhgdtc4AfUJlo1 RdnwMRDQgYJSgy8c9p1NH32G/+0mpIIuWt8LICIIo+ppJ9T+8vA/uyyS/3i8qWu33q2g KmRjs/f+ttu04+ZlQ5SdhflbeRq8o+ajAnM7HE8APtrVG2/RQM5kVSQy70XnppngFlKv XSac3SgO5g2FBLXx41b0M24ueK2mDFloEmI7Ac+Fm91ethC4zyXjUeAnb0yvzFTrpzSq bpPg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533LvVThhbx2c6ZhR/VXZL6P7loKUS2azOiXW0+ogEQvNDl+37+S /q+QNqTYB4Uz0jlozEV0cfkBtHKlnLUecVq/nYnzx3aH X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzz+MbVmmLQxp8Xgd0FkJB0y76eLsvz6vXUFtf9xxdriE2/kgwDMtRGDm6fRvAs2yU03LJ6stVJeg4pwdmCLS0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:ea88:: with SMTP id h8mr9632048pjz.175.1613746328509; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 06:52:08 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:52:08 -0600 In-Reply-To: <831rdc4epn.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pj1-x102e.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:265262 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> I suggest making RET let you execute any valid command if you have >> entered its exact name. > > This has been suggested, but unfortunately the code on master was not > modified to do that yet, and I didn't see any enthusiasm for making > such a change. It makes a great deal of sense. If the user both remembers and types out the exact command name, I think it's safe to assume that her intention is to run it.