From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 262a7c9ea0: New minor mode elide-head-mode Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2022 22:16:04 -0600 Message-ID: References: <164172314114.31544.13495331125988316383@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220109101221.E3FDAC0DA16@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87ee5htdhu.fsf@yahoo.com> <871r1ht923.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12616"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 10 05:17:46 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n6m7u-00035x-DE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 05:17:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60912 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n6m7s-0007ma-4i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2022 23:17:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n6m6L-000743-16 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2022 23:16:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pg1-f172.google.com ([209.85.215.172]:43892) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n6m6I-0002SN-UO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2022 23:16:08 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pg1-f172.google.com with SMTP id 8so10086328pgc.10 for ; Sun, 09 Jan 2022 20:16:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5JG8VVrn03tTyYuTrBxaDn5pLvqSBJJDTM6wvpmqojA=; b=L9TA5fjB19lcmf2N0lq27CNeZDIgcBUsBb4UpQRTkFPpsCM2NTAjtO9X9BH1CSgkno Tdub7GEtoYx66PnPeEaOmE+oK96P8d1bQu5cROEZ/X3CQF8RivEw7wV7eUybT/OhHPZ5 tGM5Ff4xn+BlWSzo1dJzwSzD3smbovhldtiWmC87KQ9awsR5e9J9XcVoARyo7C7v1UtH aqpUKtbIZhcGLWYgPVMSKNhhgPqShSsmFWLCs/XKXvubOvQ0BcVUAkgqPkN3MffMRATf kny8Jse9z5rvYpfT5X9nH06ezIks/7hC1fz/qB4zSnyXX36ItES74EJgY/R5z9MnXO8O HT4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530C3DF+a6sJRGyeJxWKgUwSyRJL9biK/kwOb0BZs2XvobpoZoUZ l4zP4QAWm2QSrWPqv1WzP9ODZmudHv8Tt4b7s70= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx4rE2QD2tPAve1ngCbWKoiRou9zme6QLe+4sWb+6cNnywm+iXOfcuGFnh2E7njCnWhbxeeioB9xvzjLbdKR/I= X-Received: by 2002:a62:17c7:0:b0:4bd:9fb9:f025 with SMTP id 190-20020a6217c7000000b004bd9fb9f025mr6468007pfx.35.1641788164467; Sun, 09 Jan 2022 20:16:04 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 9 Jan 2022 22:16:04 -0600 In-Reply-To: <871r1ht923.fsf@yahoo.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.215.172; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pg1-f172.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:284519 Archived-At: Po Lu writes: > Stefan Kangas writes: > >> I chose not to do that, in order not to change the (admittedly buggy) >> behavior of the old commands. But if people think it's a good idea, I >> have no objections to such a cleanup. > > Hmm, let's see if anyone else chimes in. I noticed a nice side-effect from making them wrappers around the mode: you can always say `M-x elide-head-mode' to show the header again when it's hidden and vice versa. So if users have `elide-head' on their mode hooks, they get this nice thing for free. A net win, IMO. So I've now made the suggested change on master. Thanks for proposing it.