Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Robert Pluim writes: > >> I vote +1 on the suggestion to just start using etc/NEWS.29 > > I'd be fine with that -- I don't see any significant downsides. And in > addition to avoiding the merging problems, it'd help a bit with the VC > history of the NEWS.x file itself (it can sometimes be a challenge to > try to see which change went with which NEWS entry because of the way > the history if the NEWS file goes back to 1999). How about the attached patch?