From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-28 9c222b9: Port to C compilers that lack size-0 arrays Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 11:47:37 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83bl1y85np.fsf@gnu.org> <83tufp7dae.fsf@gnu.org> <18c9aeb7-3b9e-3e94-a24b-b52ea10ce75d@cs.ucla.edu> <83lf1178zy.fsf@gnu.org> <0974b643-eec7-9bc5-f166-6897dab2c4b0@cs.ucla.edu> <83ee6s7rg6.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29664"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 04 11:48:21 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mtSaa-0007Ua-53 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2021 11:48:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59642 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mtSaZ-0001Kv-4e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2021 05:48:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53546) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mtSZx-0000gB-S6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2021 05:47:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [2607:f8b0:4864:20::42b] (port=45866 helo=mail-pf1-x42b.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mtSZv-0008H1-Ig; Sat, 04 Dec 2021 05:47:41 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id x131so5357062pfc.12; Sat, 04 Dec 2021 02:47:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=l+htQz63xaz9/78JmEeO+4V8+VurAm5S8UvBA9n1LoM=; b=qyQeWPWOjLxg1ouebQZSNIgv0yjATc6sUpU80ulJwt6ca1ENJfJh1x/kTPmsuf4e9j Vz9G6NKkzhY52AaXCIcyDEHxLh7GlH/lG9Hwg1wzt3Rb1in6O936rP2yFPrUqwvLzhlk cP+02OPU/dlRqXf2hZFZ2yaYFgYztI5Ji6K3fE0cMRbiGOQtgRcGWhTloglh76VcCmUg hECPAwxs3YJ1PRectMdQUdgevyh/Yk7gOQESR6eQdzbW5fHrUjO01N1yw04jOIejc2ca jUTH4APFqwy076vttD4dEXQSxRsCjPDtZJYUixqMvjHWXVPlYVIDM4Nq6IDsHMoyf8CE cv+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=l+htQz63xaz9/78JmEeO+4V8+VurAm5S8UvBA9n1LoM=; b=IfmTA51pPtFz4iTqs9z0oZTBvO4V3uuOkmv3tqqzkaKV2h+MNjVOfj8s36cMKkTQeQ Vpe8qAbsqwrZ6r44BzmAEDvU8rlLYpOmh8I6mPghrr8Qa+3eYCSlPW7f6/fb7tcaaaAd c1KGXdIG0MCazmyzZCEmdHUqO2JOIHw8N1Y3HRYwmVQVbrTNE2O4TydcHGY+mO8bJjzx qJXPdECsrfW8H1khXGflE9Q6Z0lmk72tWUyqNEe6ahstsentxwcAQlMvt24sUHPfYCEV Y7KiqWyzc5ZNH8KRX/6ueJci9vLKwN9sG4U8WE6ZNPOqhSQxlt6ob0mVTAbUIrAk2E9B M8dA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5317sKLHDdSikqbeWyVNtQlpXivn1KBaQdkkc/JRUvp8k5LKIhms KR+IaDyeBNfUngE/s+WZGU3bIrmS86pixAp3G3fRopbD X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyRryU6nTGD5EgeXxhdwrnfDVKYQ3V/XqDsavYw5QRktR9E3xVAc9ONqc0hMbHxPXohK8fxBrPHu+0FAr2uM7A= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2444:b0:4ab:15b9:20e5 with SMTP id d4-20020a056a00244400b004ab15b920e5mr9474328pfj.0.1638614857834; Sat, 04 Dec 2021 02:47:37 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sat, 4 Dec 2021 11:47:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83ee6s7rg6.fsf@gnu.org> X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2607:f8b0:4864:20::42b (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::42b; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pf1-x42b.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:280905 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> I suppose at some point any remaining references to MSVC could be >> removed from the Emacs source, if only to prevent further confusion >> in this area. > > Yes. It would be good to start with changing the entry on MSVC in efaq-w32.texi to say that it is unsupported, I think.