From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Updating the "ELPA Protocol" Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 12:41:51 -0800 Message-ID: References: <164484721900.31751.1453162457552427931@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <874jvcowzm.fsf@posteo.net> <83y1soypvx.fsf@gnu.org> <87y1song5x.fsf@posteo.net> <83v8nsyof7.fsf@gnu.org> <87leoond7l.fsf@posteo.net> <83r0yfzz01.fsf@gnu.org> <87bkpjyx3p.fsf@posteo.net> <83bkpjynmj.fsf@gnu.org> <87iljqya44.fsf@posteo.net> <8335auzo9s.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgd2ws8z.fsf@posteo.net> <831qqezkxj.fsf@gnu.org> <87y1slgq3m.fsf@posteo.net> <87bkpgfsqv.fsf@posteo.net> <87educ9fei.fsf@posteo.net> <87y1sk7xtg.fsf_-_@posteo.net> <87h6z0rnuz.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8921"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Philip Kaludercic , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 15 21:42:41 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ov2lU-00027v-6K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 21:42:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ov2km-0003TH-Fd; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 15:41:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ov2kk-0003Sj-RX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 15:41:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ot1-x334.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::334]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ov2kj-00077S-E9; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 15:41:54 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ot1-x334.google.com with SMTP id cn2-20020a056830658200b0066c74617e3dso9227256otb.2; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 12:41:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0k1JnjgkbLtVjqb6KE0hfxckGnmBtnIL4XcWtfqxe3M=; b=FKggBzjsjg0xkhlJAEs/vwBUgYezu+SAMFjDDE2OkW/7o7OA83OtPTl+qTEMEEDl1l 8+Ugyf3uroDn6fG52hnK9hp+TA/NXcGOqn3528zNGmK5iBCnyiBtp6SgevbOYorXCrtt zgntpO4+5/EJc29yoTAZALfslzX6YT15kqfyi/Pf8yta6oS4o4kzkUKa92pw6+PZotfQ PedilUSnBvnNxzMoY2lRuEF/wLfdJ8TorKwLnf3jkaMnZKH6aJMa8tVuXbZKes7OSKCN SgVTNpGHU78RVxEVBTkHSYQWVILsYZdo4IRCXNdn2x1CAZcpDEr6M04kBNZbWPzam91i T93Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0k1JnjgkbLtVjqb6KE0hfxckGnmBtnIL4XcWtfqxe3M=; b=NkmMVC0ZUJAr1KvPQ5MrZ1kdEm2XVPPoDh5ImG0GcPhWBFtPQld01DkOGpfzZu5LwV OmwJZDHOtN1UICWvTFcokgkRRA3FNrdGPaSiCFrdqJmFVP56vCUK2W6y5zd1/zLRi1RU /KuvqRyJDh5oNxdQf7n7f7Sq+yR40A5g59oIii+Ad1fENW0LRNYe9l4XNWLhlge6/GWn p9HHJlhxRoXZaQun9ZvcPrXussZuI7Qzi4JAwMF3z3bGOzcx8GTN0lrIBa3nyMNQdpgn DclbNx+rvtlv79Z6GLLYnVx5iznh5WfokkPW9BTWxv8zMloVelbPxh/WQpFM1OjKXaM+ wbwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pkPSyCje82xe3pphI+GQeQWZ8QI3eyCA2zVvQJJ4Tne6ERWNoDv mFvRYyUnDkYXmUOSv65djCARmrnNalcwWv2RsVk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4XSvY53OnE7WZZOMLSTn+qanin+Xgm+3NcL4c+E+E0PeAfVS82zN89wKVx6C0Aigs5AUxBoh570GBz7+qUt8Y= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6399:0:b0:661:c48b:12db with SMTP id w25-20020a9d6399000000b00661c48b12dbmr9398631otk.105.1668544911616; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 12:41:51 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 12:41:51 -0800 In-Reply-To: <87h6z0rnuz.fsf@posteo.net> X-Hashcash: 1:20:221115:eliz@gnu.org::pafkp7Y9bKC9A7G+:GbyT Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::334; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-ot1-x334.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:299885 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic writes: > One issue I have been told is the issue of renaming a package, so that > package.el can transparently handle the rename. That appears to not be > supported. How about using something like Debian's transitional packages, where you replace the old package with an empty package that just depends on the new package? Would that work?