From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 0161c9d 1/2: Load all generic-x.el modes unconditionally Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 14:47:53 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20210209160550.18823.10795@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210209160551.832FB20AD1@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87o8gti2ln.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg65jffx.fsf@gnu.org> <83im71j96z.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8552"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 09 21:56:30 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l9a3i-00028C-Sh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 21:56:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44780 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9a3h-0006mI-T7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 15:56:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48806) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9ZvR-0007OO-II for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 15:47:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]:36483) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9ZvP-0000hj-TA; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 15:47:57 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-f41.google.com with SMTP id gx20so2398374pjb.1; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 12:47:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7kbaR0j1nBeZ1Spp5HlA4s864nY7Tyhfs5CDo1J0bFo=; b=lbDHUOkJMgvOLPl+y00i8oQc4jDEiWaY0YpuZetbWTw9g0zfq8sNPQ6PHL/59XxTvl ApO6fZ3yj4ad9UmQJx0x4nzDtme6u9VqWjCpcPMGy4FxQMs+x79mip4N2Pf6zTyHtNQ7 /LH6rK3tyg9UR7+qnLfHSMm/Uy9tYxKHVCjDSRUrc8RKoJIkJKWCyeQJX+MzY8EVZ7q8 xYZ1p0HTGCZPvkDwo4yHcwI17L7Jiy5iIvUMbRG/rqwHm7byleihhzWnbhsxN1M0guOj PR14BqZDsxnNW2VmhPLREtKCO15SLXO1UGhyj5Ib0JkCyRRbZQeByuL8Kp0SBpLOooEk Cq0g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Yx3kail86hnXmil0oNvuZLIadbCnkfqKlzHVZsbHLwvJg3fPZ 6bo48rZtFtyPFv+XATFS1xJ9ueOFNUKwub9xSa3bnVZE X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzLIZ3pWynHNNHIQOWQ0+xpmKDILrZ+g2Jy7Vd7JgXmIKSqtnj4ulgxjy3awgKE2eVG1bqXmHFBFLzTvCEx5Xg= X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:31c4:b029:e1:8840:8ab9 with SMTP id v4-20020a17090331c4b02900e188408ab9mr22554282ple.70.1612903673844; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 12:47:53 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 14:47:53 -0600 In-Reply-To: <83im71j96z.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.216.41; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pj1-f41.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264244 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I don't see a discussion, just an opinion that some variable should go > away. Fair enough. But there were also no opinions to the contrary, including on the proposed patch. > Can't we remove it without activating all the modes? What would you propose?