From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposal for an improved `help-for-help' Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 13:49:43 -0600 Message-ID: References: <87h7m5iagw.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11314"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 21 20:50:22 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lDukG-0002nk-SF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 20:50:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42178 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDukF-0008Mi-Uj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 14:50:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33134) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDuji-0007wG-W5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 14:49:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pg1-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:42836) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDujh-0001fK-FL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 14:49:46 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pg1-f174.google.com with SMTP id o38so8745772pgm.9 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 11:49:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Q81Pt98Ah7NrY9B6pbNpDCi8y6l3hVwqMwaGothl7Zo=; b=Y4Y5B4EXoz8KKzyDFW6CIHQDI8Hqnd53Cke/3HgBlv4YdjRij+vrQf7KumT2swdIPZ qRF204o3XkIJm/k4YWAfTlqAKT02ggoeQNGldn2lWLOZ2oJqlufPnSxFfn2MjpwkA0sd ael5s1sXdYA7XKEIo6Kz2/TmJVYVlGaO8ryXtNwa5OWKSGOKhHif1l2a2JYcu7arytAp xZqM5pUyGvG07bWYxpb4LRNOeIKoLl1CwjdM05sBNGUdTJWmTXC08r0laacnRKV3CjkF QaXtqTXweEv9gGmahUq43F/uYcZb8a12Bq8a8+B27A3RVRnWGtrO91ctAHT68ARtWjJI dLjw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5305c2GVlM2J4Ufvm1rey5b/Id8GVfwkdCG/Z/NePb8lvSL+i/Iq Z/nlwunoTYXL1TtvZOfSHpUt5X5ZErl6Asv+fNo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxDDFi+EFA34HOQmTXeKPak8bqjfQ36VgdOGJDtVCo59arkhjme7ZOe3E/Pf8NZ7yAw2hW+UWHKOoJ6N1JZdOo= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8384:0:b029:1ed:1317:fbe4 with SMTP id u4-20020aa783840000b02901ed1317fbe4mr16550052pfm.57.1613936984058; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 11:49:44 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 13:49:43 -0600 In-Reply-To: <87h7m5iagw.fsf@gnus.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.215.174; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pg1-f174.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:265434 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Is using font locking the best option here, though? What about just > inserting the text with the text properties already applied? Yes, that would probably be better. It's a little bit more work, but shouldn't be too bad.