From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Organizing the NEWS file a bit better Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 08:57:39 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87wnnwp3g8.fsf@gnus.org> <87tuiyqklv.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5373"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Emacs developers To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 06 08:58:51 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mN8ah-0001E0-31 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 08:58:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42854 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mN8af-000691-NJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 02:58:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57442) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mN8Zl-0004uz-Ci for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 02:57:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]:36712) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mN8Zj-0006Bi-Tz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 02:57:53 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-f41.google.com with SMTP id u13-20020a17090abb0db0290177e1d9b3f7so3695627pjr.1 for ; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 23:57:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WhtF9zVFCXUyHuKYwckX35P9vhNb7TIxt52Y9H/Yltk=; b=rdUVJpTAfrX2rb+ZxsH8htSgVaN1z/0F/gLKZ3GCMFVZiFR1lHvXf4V/vF2pHvy1ZU dWKJvMSXgVJaZ1uPHsXAyYKBdcGhQbPeZyOVIE23a1TBqPw85lYdqcUhyqMY9oiXeeff WBOJL2Yg99sR2L2iqGtq9O8rtJdRy/oN1fsV9ha6wiDvES7tWWbPPRjg53X6C3kO9CzJ YH0TW+SlvLY/wVEbTJyDtTNLg6b9XMZLVXd3EaA/eeSDvUt7QtyVQ+WAQgDBCdKPy/Yc T54HFk2tR4cfJv4SzzPSxEKNdYoAEtG2ICen5mXbrpvwlGJZqaGwCgNK4vC2RmgWLaok QBuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ZF0ESENSLNPrzTxvQtjcVrJuB5JHtGR59MKAeAc8/PxzJ2Iyv cqEfPSrraMmu2ZxKdoLCzSzNJ+W7pN4bWLwgxTKOKDMx3Uw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy/GS1YTpYyYBjaNTHO7XkDcPb4Wu5m6Rf0D4odtRTHpyFCIjkVCOZt2b1XjSBr0xSAFjMu5i2twdAEWDTBphU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3812:: with SMTP id mq18mr2464083pjb.143.1630911470403; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 23:57:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87tuiyqklv.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.216.41; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pj1-f41.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:274077 Archived-At: Juri Linkov writes: > > I tried hard to ensure nothing was lost,[1] but if you want to check > > this yourself you could use, e.g.: > > > > comm -3 <(git show HEAD^:etc/NEWS|sort) <(sort etc/NEWS) > > This shows that 'benchmark-call' is lost (I don't know if it needs a NEWS entry). Thanks, now restored. > Adding a tag at the end of the same line would be a big improvement. Yes, it would certainly make editing the file easier, and help avoid mishaps like the above. Perhaps we could try it for Emacs 29? If we do it soon after cutting the new branch, it should be easier to change it back if we find any reason to.