From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Include which-key.el in the Emacs distribution Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 20:40:30 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20200908201434.hrvupafbu2kyvb4q@Ergus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7020"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Justin Burkett , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ergus , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 08 22:41:17 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kFkQW-0001je-Uc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 22:41:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51566 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFkQW-0006Ny-05 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 16:41:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52616) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFkPr-0005XZ-Bd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 16:40:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-f50.google.com ([209.85.218.50]:37113) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFkPp-0000jM-5w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 16:40:34 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-f50.google.com with SMTP id nw23so325890ejb.4 for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 13:40:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6xHvClDWLGu6qjRfPnp5GXrnlTqPmiK0mAmIKrn6KwI=; b=tmkUZH+FxduSHjJpLzvsAgszeXRCzt7DBGSj6YYp2RaskdWIKD2lD/QWXd5I19Drmx uMkULehTmtRJQGGJ4rOX8r6abRWPDdgCYfIExa/nV7gBMixlieay2q8pmVjxbvgoYtJI kaJUgV1Bey86V2p7KIL7TkednjSjZPJKOFxBE4r9d/9Qg4q7DC6Fq9xbxgEqZA44Tbf0 E0ffVZKjhIKbMgHhLNR6kvXgr5wz7p8qq2E8lQPE8vm+gkwu7Xaq3P3ef4ueiOLzq9XU 2W/rBvorNHdOJiIK2CLHvveoRDIngRVmdfbliRPNV/GGenC9CWx3gFqHFxZI6dwYO8PD V7lg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531tD3niGG4+wQMTRf+wYaQ1KwQ3jS1/PqaHYZT92wyNBf0oIbzY ppvHaLgrUGg6g79o1/NOcENqn0Cdb1E88na5B/g= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwMSICmgD9v+UhC8k8jBxbgUxo6UyfBM1MIhY/8OgBddRvhEs/fTdTROL+gp5miwCeP5x0IN/GppK+luCUS39g= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:fb8f:: with SMTP id lr15mr254898ejb.25.1599597631190; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 13:40:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 20:40:30 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20200908201434.hrvupafbu2kyvb4q@Ergus> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.218.50; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-f50.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/08 16:40:31 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:254813 Archived-At: Ergus writes: > I really love which-key but enabling it by default for everyone could be > a bit premature. Maybe adding a very easy to find option in the toolbar > could be a better first step? > > So the ones (like me) who love it can improve it until it becomes ready > to be default without the complains if the other who doesn't. Yes, we should definitely make any necessary improvements before considering to make it the default. I believe that's what Stefan M was also arguing, so I see no disagreement on that point.