From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove obsolete fast-lock and lazy-lock libraries Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:08:21 -0700 Message-ID: References: <83364v5j28.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2mm4n07.fsf@gnu.org> <83ft8t43og.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13016"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: jnorden@tntech.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 12 20:09:31 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k5vBr-0003IX-Rm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 20:09:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39096 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5vBq-0004dT-TJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:09:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40310) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5vAm-0003M8-RG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:08:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yb1-xb41.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::b41]:43902) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5vAl-0007EI-CX; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:08:24 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yb1-xb41.google.com with SMTP id m200so1835115ybf.10; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:08:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GizBuDF2D5Yj5Ag0d5czj1HD17UT+8BioktEfn9x214=; b=RVCHX/pcBHQuTkPYnIeXh0rzbsKgeRmym6QWkseNYByryouEu7UuTL3+eeGaSfTPZa cPYB/BhEWiSii7li/xoTJjJ7Izex2galO3NVEMKWBxANC/DDqtvImO+Sj3FN3a5479Cs X9hsJnnMzhq6NRw8nhEVkwwLI+sRX3CfH2wTbkNKDohSdzGAAn33AJSNgbMtZaKTElDG ZSDooMFN2mCVaXFUYI9lD5TRXTN+Ek3GXH+RvL+OH6gqTeDxBoYsHAOLP1XR9hgdo6+X gxvPnHkxoqJqHcnqyIEIpI/mU+PT+BsRT7lrI3q3QbfKxr5O9y45vBt+8gt9j6P4AcdT N+vg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GizBuDF2D5Yj5Ag0d5czj1HD17UT+8BioktEfn9x214=; b=nGLX/75vfbiBsSvsQeTyf5RFBfLAvLvQsXRThvYoMPwfFncBocFGsV4RqyIX4MQIvI iH1wJfy+N11c69c09t9bRUnuOXdCt1IGT8flJ8iOYb8gtie0EYwy5xFh9fRmsWtYEZpE TuHMzP5qL0JHslIZnS5696jhZXq7LpT8cmNpSBfIuJopWgzSjFPDRSAw+Z80GhF+gnf0 Kk7nfKL4QFMuqmvaePuhFGi1c2O+8rgmmmPrEY2TVOqYZTsToqnMY7wguN2/Oq+zVPM2 C9PG9gUTNGYfS6H219QPErij1TJSwWfUGT7JsUzgwyWItQM4nKJRC+YdHkRepNMqfKJk mdIA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533GvmlZp1YgJoo30zMt4M6nJVy66JcyroQYl85zTLSXu7UQoTDy VS55S0utYQBXFn5OhgSpZh4Vg8/axOLxQzlbmIK1s3Kn/cQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJys2Q5oSQDNwYkcTU9Pgz+ILpOBEDMN8XPMuUkUDJ7Kr9NzqnVMUkTlqX/eMPgC++9GMwlIt5t1eZcRkgaI9Nk= X-Received: by 2002:a25:4609:: with SMTP id t9mr806884yba.231.1597255702133; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:08:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:08:21 -0700 In-Reply-To: <83ft8t43og.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::b41; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-yb1-xb41.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:253708 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> That's why I'm suggesting a `font-lock-debug-mode` instead. >> >> > Do you see any harm in keeping it as a defcustom? >> >> If we add `font-lock-debug-mode` I don't see any benefit in keeping it. >> The harm is limited to accumulating cruft. > > If you are saying that we should make a single change which introduces > font-lock-debug-mode and makes font-lock-support-mode a defvar, then I > agree. I thought you were advocating to make only the latter change, > and then consider the former at some future time. That sounds good. Could we perhaps add that as a feature request to the bug tracker and get rid of fast-lock and lazy-lock to begin with? Best regards, Stefan Kangas