From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Consistent face for keys in *Help* and `substitute-command-keys' Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 08:11:07 -0600 Message-ID: References: <83a6rhxwah.fsf@gnu.org> <837dmlxspt.fsf@gnu.org> <834khpxr0s.fsf@gnu.org> <8335x8ybw9.fsf@gnu.org> <87czwageno.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <878s6xwngp.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <874khjq6p8.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <875z1ylrdw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83eegmok4v.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22570"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, Juri Linkov To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 13 15:12:06 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lL4zt-0005iK-3s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:12:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48380 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lL4zs-0000GB-2L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 09:12:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39878) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lL4z1-0007lz-IT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 09:11:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-f178.google.com ([209.85.214.178]:42864) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lL4yz-0007O2-Ix; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 09:11:11 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-f178.google.com with SMTP id e2so7976454pld.9; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 06:11:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tpzGvy1Q/GHXEg5KohGqFcMl2OsC8zYdMm0WHwz4cV4=; b=Cg9tDp8QrrCcv8sE9PKDhrEsTClvNrPPzhDc8r4rx6oslSPbojj5dlKVHS2ADdpA/b sqoNjsFUFBJ47vBvdQYWklnPa4HEdnpZqQuWsL2aOTxDKV2963G6WNR/KEEWzvy0Uewz +9cBiSNwvJJbf2jEqYqXUdk2tFm8R4YXFLa5ueBvpOIsJfQsaE7KgHmmoeFe2Bd4PR5v glvKV/Yt0HnTM/SPbfxxxqKV+/v6iXaUyUip73JoPjOfE79faIPkkAVUxRctEmC8v5Wr 0CYFs/uFg/zxLHK6wbVfF82SQt4d9M1sfIxbD5T3IN/HCaA9kfO+13v2znmF5vtExrwS VQrQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532hgKB5WT1TtrPvr6Bxr0fk73ONOQ8do2fOECdmV4okh+sG47Wk iAuppfQcIaZRLocsUEQGbqWAisXBBx0yCrq4bN8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJynuhT1GJ3ghE63Y5zK1pc7aQSXYw8f8HUkcGQAGzXznHMWAg0Zcgi8+5vEXED/xN7WOdF6ZhfG6w5vT8U2Ywg= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:f986:: with SMTP id cq6mr3848323pjb.175.1615644667655; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 06:11:07 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 08:11:07 -0600 In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.178; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pl1-f178.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266429 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> Is there anything we could do to avoid this if we use :box? Is it >> annoying enough to avoid :box completely? > > For the modeline, the solution was to use a negative width for the box. Thanks, that fixes the issue with the resizing minibuffer.