From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: woman.el broken? Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 12:46:33 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20210301193951.7EB04C217D7@raman-glaptop.localdomain> <878s763bah.fsf@gnus.org> <83r1ky7icm.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgzm1vvf.fsf@gnus.org> <83mtvm7hkt.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfb469e7.fsf@gnu.org> <835z28l2r2.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32824"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 03 19:48:41 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lHWY4-0008PM-MI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 19:48:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47132 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHWY3-0007C5-MI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 13:48:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33282) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHWW5-0004R5-RA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 13:46:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]:42686) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHWW4-0007p0-6f; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 13:46:37 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-f175.google.com with SMTP id s16so14536888plr.9; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 10:46:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kEVGlSEVUrO1vrNhn538i/GJ7ntPb7vUCR7Yl1WPuYU=; b=JjKu5r6IynXIIGgcHJKr43z9xQHE7jQ/227tOTzU0krpbwfx7ML9eAw6387Hq+iGJg 4NuMxUT5Tmty3+SX+ucvQ1bsAt45t1EtWR+upzDX/59lJDur2G+5vZeLZCdrLsxdhVM4 akvumsvC3bcEoYVkswfmcVDNphJUN+MOP0mmEgRZCBxwIKMuope6XBrfqWano7hB+0u+ uKdoWmZtZs1qRqK/F7OOYrD71nMq04BuVi4sFiDxS1x3H8ezm6/iKhYC4I1gDFQGV13H CTtm3Ms84uw5Uu8GAMW/XsabzVLuRkEgnA2tQFlPwRZLfyA6RAXAxG7KLhIvp8hwc/Va aypg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531s7xfu97sx+Qee3mpgwC6lSp4onZrVLuLNaX9iEwjtXk8e/MyX 0AL8WFyeV7/oPVcBbvuF8XcPy4LOWd+XC7/mdTiDCj0r X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyTLy4yoaUZgiuXF1LULFEW4XebV5iRPLs63FPkFoZ9CZU1UDPk1qNmhv6AMomLblotmwBa+jE+2BuLwFyW8hM= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:e83:: with SMTP id fv3mr447070pjb.179.1614797194388; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 10:46:34 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 12:46:33 -0600 In-Reply-To: <835z28l2r2.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.175; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pl1-f175.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:265899 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> For "Foo Bar Baz", is it enough to look for "foo-bar-baz" or would we >> need to look for both "Foo-Bar-Baz" as well? > > Based on what I see in our tree, only the former, but please > double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything. Will do, thanks.