From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 12ca463 1/4: ; * test/lisp/textmodes/css-mode-tests.el: Add TODO. Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 15:54:09 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20200921144653.9320.23809@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200921144656.3E99C206ED@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87zh5ihr5p.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7143"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Emacs developers , Dmitry Gutov To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 22 15:56:44 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kKimh-0001l1-QN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 15:56:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52588 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKimg-0004fM-Dy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:56:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39626) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKikR-00046p-Qr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:54:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-f49.google.com ([209.85.218.49]:46470) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKikQ-0002tE-8e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:54:23 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-f49.google.com with SMTP id z23so22938319ejr.13 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 06:54:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fuOxJ/mksA7PaKdCyi6xyFpblh/Iep/AlACJkAFvKAg=; b=U1rzX9juQD1hBipCUmkll+WqWhvz+v07k7to3vjvxL9PtpC7W+8AvOd4JrGL5IrLBE XILBhiUfUR0WfOmdfVLU2x37ff6jeFN6NnkxVY4lDE8Bt9Op1vn2J/LfvSlN2pE8mXM9 sxTscL2AZEjrm38/a0iCQNGUIkJmb+dqlz7eoOetYLtehn6NBan638PHgNTtR5RaGOie ovi50x3OqmwrwB52yovpXzqV/PETZ9sp9+jPB7CVrY36ybaWWXlBssKO1yodx06d+5gD bAzB56YGdRux13TmYC5UAVz7TYeUrj+EJy6MYlZXW8yhe+Kwfg1nKSUkUBsqnIoqmSLn AliQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530TAcgetzUXqOvLKro8mTHuS0eBVgKzQG6dMIaKpBWBLgkKzDb3 xSSL3P+kmU0ajJoW89oVEj1/tagNj61Cetu5eaA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxX13pcDh7xKVkP6iYOywtLGUpcDfz3s5+Cv4cAauk028THC6Z6fBdoIBl1eFl8CnfbYlqWkCJ7z8FT6U6b9e8= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a88a:: with SMTP id ha10mr5350383ejb.532.1600782860751; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 06:54:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87zh5ihr5p.fsf@gnus.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.218.49; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-f49.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/22 09:54:21 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:256320 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Yeah, more automatic checks are better, but they can sometimes be > cumbersome to work with manually... Fixing the latter somehow would be > nice. I usually prefer running tests non-interactively. My main issue is that I have to manually scroll to find the failing test in the compilation buffer. Perhaps we should adapt the ert format to be more easily parsable by compilation-mode? ISTR a discussion like that not long ago. I would also like the option to see the full backtrace for a test on "make check" et al.