From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tick Reduction Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 14:41:11 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87bl2hyzca.fsf@gnus.org> <8735nszpdv.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfvswrp8.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgq0tu7z.fsf@gnus.org> <83wnl4v8dh.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1bcuxld.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7c8uvvc.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32397"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, dgutov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 19 14:42:41 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mo4A5-0008FE-6Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 14:42:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39472 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mo4A3-0003ne-RZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:42:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57674) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mo48i-0002G6-4c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:41:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b] (port=41897 helo=mail-pg1-x52b.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mo48f-00021L-KA; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:41:14 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id 28so8654955pgq.8; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 05:41:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SKLVF9x+serOjlmfCcQgvG4Jp0FBzSyv0UWTImOuvh8=; b=nd9vHNbJwTQ+xUqEcZ6v4zSXtMRzu55WiU/g+yjYJNoe4whxwUyjoy6DIq/23eziI5 OlVvsNh8XMfA0M1CZNJbopz0DV2593UR4kKZzdzkAG93d3GN/z4B54/HsOXbEfJWjBa1 bkKA5MGi8V6uI4Eogn9JKzqN/YEqfNw1JI7R3Wb8SLZzgQPFqQ93uiKVTo8+vGYdsC/v 5C8T08aL64tyCldxLots5eev3OH6AESphVFBPJcogQt70ncXvHSDoi+27aWJFB8aIXh4 b1lVToBD/YExmfKWlxT59bbT/AZvMGWdLI5dPISVpDrR6NJZsewtT38cvJojpo0qBjvg Chmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SKLVF9x+serOjlmfCcQgvG4Jp0FBzSyv0UWTImOuvh8=; b=rWaZpFEtwOyDjAtO4GOGo2dDskgavSNLBsTAPiOEQE+/g2zLKf1nUxIG1booXHB8GS I245djnCEuIFmQwORH7ZjWognq4QGuUyxA8roBfJgeVd5ZY553mCMuVOaUhCleRR8WD1 aDP1pKDqDzhGBZUMRKRmO1b1VdT6SEPSr38a1c8AMF1jDuY1r6sE+ZQXXpT5VNGL4MkW 0I4/LxkU7S0Q2e3UgtSf8bxENtA1R/b14Btt3gPQh1RzsecEv9XtD0fnI/Mu7MDQfiAk Gufuk4azt0c3i3X/t/sz0PtZy6/J8VDo6Z7gdoZFNQ/1gwiUbwWG4UvYlbBKycrkz6fh 1KBA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532bKFXTIF6qsX6g8nK4JH7x9LY5dj9xgWu8wkmDryAohAHFwEIQ 6TChBCGFuqOJy7IO1QLVITUyh+cYI+eB03r6m311F/1u X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzhRC7pMWtzyx/I1sUx7bThUrCKUd7pvyjZk42I1CcFmI3GSs1f5jB0aHHV/1POTbj4C4o+g2zAr1PPGy13GCM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1909:b0:49f:a0d0:abcf with SMTP id y9-20020a056a00190900b0049fa0d0abcfmr63766458pfi.70.1637329271741; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 05:41:11 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 14:41:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83h7c8uvvc.fsf@gnu.org> X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pg1-x52b.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:279759 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Is that the default that corresponds to standard-fontset-spec in > fontset.el, or did you tweak your system or Emacs to use that family? They come automatically if you install emacs-gtk (gtk depends on pango, pango depends on fontconfig, fontconfig depends on ttf-bitstream-vera that has these two fonts). With emacs-lucid, you have a direct dependency on fontconfig so its the same thing there. > I don't think I follow: there's no variable-pitch face, or any face > that inherits from it, in the "C-h C-h" display, AFAICT. What am I > missing? Oh, I didn't install that patch yet, did I? I forgot about that little detail... So my guess was not a winner.