From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Cleaning up rcirc Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 11:53:55 +0200 Message-ID: References: <875yv7dqw7.fsf@posteo.net> <87sfy8g8pi.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39214"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Philip Kaludercic , Emacs developers To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 13 11:56:33 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mPihU-000A2G-Qk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 11:56:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49424 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mPihT-0000Jr-5I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 05:56:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44892) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mPifD-00068Q-A9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 05:54:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf1-f179.google.com ([209.85.210.179]:34377) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mPifB-0001Nj-DA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 05:54:10 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-f179.google.com with SMTP id g14so8291861pfm.1 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 02:54:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=v9bpW7QWHCd1bTh9jpIJOLj6IOgguo2dp/gL56e3LnU=; b=yvdR75RPqNmd0RVaV29vKiOJGi43IoEUcgHe/MC7c3vhCUGvEA/jPXtx7KtLJn8T0N fghzjbUGbFxWxE6jjndo4uijRKycfR6AJRwAIcnpJ2i1xQ1XiUHA02m1me/E9Eoq/zx6 8WEvQNwf9vZ0WAcYXbyaJo2W6QsBTVo3pyUndIdgnDV5SQkMP2YxPGoaO0iMCtayqf5B uRxsNgbI5czKqcDtZOTQCh0Qu8SztDeYJea42J/b3vDIF2s3XXGskniTxyRjx2FAOBw/ dNEjUhxTeaWUbgVywzAD61jKutI+/0R+DQ2BgvKIQubfDnEZWyKYm9e0Pv21hlj0B2Nj /l7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Ogq2Bkn+4eCFG5YuJkumC6rYBd3mlVfmU69oXTNVViYdc4Lok FescpX8TE0ZvqahPve6KW+WGUxiJb/t8Izj7h8w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxgXUCWT+4KFVTr2T5SCPpZlMYSLw4mmUaMGcIxMVOLkrY1tG8YHq/spAe016xRKTlvWvrS4D3VCamOQ85kt/M= X-Received: by 2002:a62:ea06:0:b0:3e1:62a6:95b8 with SMTP id t6-20020a62ea06000000b003e162a695b8mr10442512pfh.70.1631526847585; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 02:54:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87sfy8g8pi.fsf@gnus.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.210.179; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pf1-f179.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:274626 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > Oh, and another thing I was thinking about. Currently the default value > > for rcirc-server-alist connects the user to irc.libera.chat and lets > > them join #rcirc. I was wondering if it would be ok to add #emacs to > > this list too, seeing as rcirc is implied to be the default IRC client > > for Emacs (by "M-x irc"). I can imagine that since the channel is not > > directly affiliated to the GNU project, that there might be objections? > > Adding #emacs is fine, I think. Is the #rcirc channel very active? If not, would it perhaps make sense to have only #emacs in that list?