From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tick Reduction Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 11:28:52 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87bl2hyzca.fsf@gnus.org> <8735nszpdv.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfvswrp8.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgq0tu7z.fsf@gnus.org> <83wnl4v8dh.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32243"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 19 11:32:46 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mo1CI-0008ES-Em for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 11:32:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46778 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mo1CG-00074g-JG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 05:32:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60074) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mo18g-0003iX-Vq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 05:29:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [2607:f8b0:4864:20::62f] (port=39804 helo=mail-pl1-x62f.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mo18Y-00026U-KW; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 05:29:02 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id z6so6606209plk.6; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 02:28:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oJqzt1H0uxnGH+b1dHidZvNUTeqXCfj/rdxx/GYvpvk=; b=co4xGJqqE8wpfhTOl+CUNHT0dinhzkrAOngvPi4ddDZxdJzZo+zWNlg1GfK+Z+bCh1 K1l7Di5vc6a37+Xyxid8x2ec1Mk30voAHVZKtB8HbS4sBTC4bW/XiGqTeW8EWuJSgy40 uBbmsmsA4uDtXHAEzVCPcDpKcIT4sp40ZW/6IBDV6uDMG7b3S98aKSQg6fXJyOqrDHaI mc2HOQqP+Z/lRYyJMZDCuEk8YjkhxYBWUWHMpV3vnM894hmUoO8LwcEUQXvEQjr+GwV/ jfZlwljT7XAEOzACt25Hd53WOgk9R/U5d6u3xIQfiENqz2I4t14ee0VBXEHCu/qmV5Kt rl0A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oJqzt1H0uxnGH+b1dHidZvNUTeqXCfj/rdxx/GYvpvk=; b=u19AX7zmiUIAZaL9p85SYlfXmReO98I7NPR6byx7fZLkZopAS5KmRGizAaYKPnNh/C j/HULeJ4Qr8siZRCaqBTbp4b3VKDkErsJJrTslp3pOAzz5QDxBAxGwa2PxHjSy9n5zSH eCNEWQU0Mo3idK+0CHoGzG39KmrAdSmXoDiv+oWkeZ0RSnvgORKNWe087+9P+dNsaaqw 9WgAeycc3LU4LCe+cgpbOSr7JcOSHVxSG/bhZ+uZ0i8yx6YmisUrPOkNQhbq12IR9AQM hAl8HPsE/VRQWyYDcFhRgOMMW20N+AYvSfczO9ItzustXM7d7WdjLQtuF1b6ovGfiTJk l3Dw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5336Z8DkRoHGpnNDsiQ1BjOuI3BIndBpmEojjZZ/UCUYhoFfdXT+ 30EfxgAwh52WGWMx791DTJubHGg7X7ZT38+sTcC7RcOb X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyotG0jkpBtnmBTpot5P3+4vQPssbBGQOZiDHpE7zJseH7xej9zl7LPFuFm0Gjfpxe+sE4yBXFERpdzKhGpFb4= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:be10:: with SMTP id a16mr3289299pjs.133.1637317733243; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 02:28:53 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 11:28:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83wnl4v8dh.fsf@gnu.org> X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2607:f8b0:4864:20::62f (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::62f; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pl1-x62f.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:279742 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Here the font of variable-pitch face is actually larger by a pixel or > two, but this is MS-Windows. I suspect that the fonts used are from two different font families, and thus have different x-heights. Could you check which fonts are being used for both variable-pitch and fixed-pitch, and which font sizes are reported by Emacs when one looks larger than the other?