From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Consistent face for keys in *Help* and `substitute-command-keys' Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 20:26:46 -0600 Message-ID: References: <87h7m5iagw.fsf@gnus.org> <83blc9tnvz.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7381"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 25 03:28:51 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lF6OY-0001p6-Rw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 03:28:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43454 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lF6OX-0004mw-TI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 21:28:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48574) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lF6Mc-0003s4-KD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 21:26:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-f43.google.com ([209.85.216.43]:39473) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lF6Ma-00024f-PD; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 21:26:50 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-f43.google.com with SMTP id d2so2624844pjs.4; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 18:26:48 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YyMgr52Eet7rWv7tXvSa1ZSJiyrbyyMPNdWQ7GYFpGM=; b=XBy+JsbBC9LoSkPsZ00f9xa/35uS25CndKcI5OnV3VRPr+O5Es9Hxg5zbWa4NHXj2A SKxNDjI+OrqFRKGGC7S81tj69PnlOiX/k5W21Z+y4ykeE73jZFIFbSQORdlPkzuyHWds Ceh3vp+R7pZVQtbVq5RXgHatDTBYthm3Ob2GUmNHtobX066T+WvMgl9uc3h9NdPD6MIK k5ah5KY0pRbxO1JxCw14QxELvUXLyPffJbAtoA7LEk5UnhDOJ2FOKQGs4BJuM8+vY2N3 Fv8kHBXHh7sAphbe1BJBUEirNXzAK9vjuvZMtWPddYGmRUdyqAhri/SJrdnxas0redg2 PmkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531H9Rpvgoed51hZ0rV14eEWTkQRAZQSXMptq3MUqONhzc+KMvUe ccwhaaeCmvCnXkom7r8L6iwmOtg8jSdiddGAoJMowY6O X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwmfVlhokJWaDuL5r1D6psIGU9AmDZdv1bwp5h4heSoElQpKwAuTRjQPBwh/058j7QyAACnk3fscWKexumY+pw= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:f986:: with SMTP id cq6mr913931pjb.175.1614220006942; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 18:26:46 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 20:26:46 -0600 In-Reply-To: <83blc9tnvz.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.216.43; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pj1-f43.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:265602 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > What about tooltips? we run their text through > substitute-command-keys, AFAIR, but the tooltip's faces need to use > smaller fonts. So at the very least this face should be documented to > affect only some of the face attributes, not all of them (which is > generally not such a good idea, as it confuses users). This doesn't have any effect on the appearance of the tooltip, neither in GTK or Lucid. Perhaps because it is all overwritten with the `tooltip' face in `tooltip'-show? Or am I missing something? BTW, it doesn't seem to have any effect to customize the `tooltip' face here. Is it supposed to change the look of the tooltip in GTK?