From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [nongnu] main 74116339a8 2/3: * elpa-packages (anzu): New package Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 04:02:25 -0600 Message-ID: References: <164145738158.2838.5769558384331859964@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220106082302.0A19CC0DA1E@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87k0fdmbat.fsf@posteo.net> <87tueh3s2x.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29247"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 07 11:08:14 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n5mAP-0007LS-BM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 11:08:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44306 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n5mAO-0006Yc-0G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 05:08:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60174) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n5m4q-0000N6-D1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 05:02:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pf1-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:41491) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n5m4o-0005a3-UD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 05:02:28 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-f174.google.com with SMTP id m1so4773265pfk.8 for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 02:02:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JBKtR6xC4gqPWixtJ843KDahOh2/2VXIRUr7ES+odxo=; b=M6zu9vBR+MgeRqzYHwjsJhMoFsJOjpBa+GWvsTH+v0okTFqLvjPShCJwuG07SXDgxo miLLTmePeUafp1EZEmpA9sDnxzXofHOLYgJHwwaFd9R8tGgyE0BuFSykKjgltp4+yCBY VPEVavI1pMoYgDMlKMYm77txI6OjeS0x6kgtr2r9G8bm1H9EJcxQGAbfaRjCLl7d5Zyi Pr0zZS98AqLBpp2FNtKWzQXLTIk2sINdnh7GGMC0ZlWDIyMeXctwxC98yR2c3TDbzcFO 9lUScKWxsMx0e5+lbsJLZ8afwuMXZaNN0nn2Jx6koMKcrPKQAvzouakV1KnUNcSX6/OE hLcg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ATDLA1LG0k/UhkwTIL9LqPbgix2u+hZLt7LMXs+EvIWAEArDx 4a8Mu1azwEX25Mbesgel3urhyT0NHl7o9AStL44= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxXvdKKGgKLrhgyBVLyoWJe9RA4O6YeiKBtyNjVBGIUy0TTilftKwkW2ukm66d9OxyFwr1PTSYtPR8TMCoiBBM= X-Received: by 2002:a63:5d41:: with SMTP id o1mr55063620pgm.325.1641549745611; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 02:02:25 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 04:02:25 -0600 In-Reply-To: <87tueh3s2x.fsf@posteo.net> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.210.174; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pf1-f174.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:284399 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic writes: > What could they do with this information? I guess they would disagree, > and that would be it. If they agree, they could say in their README that their package is obsolete with Emacs version NN or later. But Juri says that it adds more features that we don't yet have in Emacs OOTB, so I don't know if that is true.