From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 11:16:14 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83zgriwnv2.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnmmwnn3.fsf@gnu.org> <8735p9jo51.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87sfx9i74s.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8793"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Emacs developers , Juri Linkov To: =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin_Le_Gouguec?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 10 11:17:25 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mZUxQ-000285-Uy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 11:17:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48018 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZUxO-0008CX-UB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 05:17:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47774) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZUwZ-0007WB-6K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 05:16:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf1-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:39605) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZUwX-0003UB-51; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 05:16:30 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-f174.google.com with SMTP id x130so3150699pfd.6; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 02:16:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qGKTBhr3KQcNT6/Q9jo2HmoElwEqOFP9TligwyhsDcw=; b=wEFuRnBv1pWuGwugTvGr9FCpsZOAzbQfDiS7hmlSoDYCrBKRIYNWHVvaMHEG9n3Y/y StoYtBBY+ogq0Vu1ur82ixpEZBCjnxPi9AWnFmsb4D+MR5nCPKF/iXJ/Iq3yJAyui4/V J84LUngQq+Bz2vrV3dRmQBy/dO6UvEX9PJB2fsEwo/kkhHGCXGnf7Ebarm1UsXzKYqNJ cNOiFsIad4Dm/dRFNs1vu0WRpq68+sWiTAK5zssrLu8kVO13eBMEPnsMZ7/jHZ/cZPo3 8BicDckoKMweymyMu7hzZ3WrbRSQYGsMQkC8LUxA20pYxbVFWD9fcyI/V3uRVIhQ4Fo0 w6GQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532YJQeeXKth4PXCiQ9U/QRu0sPsJqrSk8MTg81+9FiNckK5AohJ kMxnadojvP3KJvWeIUz1/ZCCETi6/RrbTm2xGNM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxfe2ciU1bbz6dZLiT6Agq475XlaWqwqkjDh87Jx5fFrIiIpLmMu6nEDL77lzV0karfmrR5MMs83ThcK8ljG1s= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:978b:0:b0:44c:abf1:a8b8 with SMTP id o11-20020aa7978b000000b0044cabf1a8b8mr19478718pfp.35.1633857385903; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 02:16:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87sfx9i74s.fsf@gmail.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.210.174; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pf1-f174.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276646 Archived-At: K=C3=A9vin Le Gouguec writes: > I find "mash X to run in new Y" simpler to remember than "press X then 5 > to run in new Y". I very much agree, the new binding is logical and easy to remember to me: C-x 4 4 other-window-prefix C-x 5 5 other-frame-prefix