From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: native-comp-async-report-warnings-errors default value Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 13:10:41 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87h7dj7su7.fsf@gmail.com> <83r1cnlu6y.fsf@gnu.org> <87czo77rx7.fsf@gmail.com> <837dcmamt2.fsf@gnu.org> <83v90694ka.fsf@gnu.org> <83v901zdh6.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0g3cagl.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7b7c6ge.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3793"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 17 22:12:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1myKWT-0000jU-2w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:12:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49766 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1myKWR-0005HS-OP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 16:12:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52924) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1myKV3-0004L9-Tb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 16:10:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [2607:f8b0:4864:20::42f] (port=35778 helo=mail-pf1-x42f.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1myKV2-00051c-Ft; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 16:10:45 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id v11so85724pfu.2; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 13:10:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XBl6ZO3PUOGayPxgxr2SBWPFMO8IvzfyhdXNQ6IHVi4=; b=J+HyPvZP1vFSmevhAZITqUMs95jPdvWiIJ79czvvVH0Ojf30INPkky6dlMTHlttA0h FGiMYTJ7lMn67YDTXy2xs9WzbUCmAmP4DBlH4JQsZMo7hcs4OfOGAT3E225QbKCNWkjf U1t5+sOdWaImiFZY0AKP6YmqTnVfOBh6iws2FHW+mvuSYrd/qqJUvNyb9oqBetDmEg8f QM8af/8UegrpKZxWkenRUKbtTZUPMdQgRiv/JaJazupuuwonfVD4/Tn5omfqYWs8ZfC3 zEElC/s2gCQC6ExtU/d3yJC3ngUL1uBojvYc2ilQL+GEteaNoGCb48wJvuLOESi1MzsC DwdA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XBl6ZO3PUOGayPxgxr2SBWPFMO8IvzfyhdXNQ6IHVi4=; b=nBkXHglH2hR3BPaIi1g4M64YP2HG+UKlDH4HxBcA2kDDHHANMVI9cLhm3SuCO/1st8 cs5ZFU6OmU7Fb7xnGDORi2NKASPaVIZnUe3BEfYwcLG6lYoQCqoOI5lL3hfewE4O/IhJ OEFgzUYbi/CqQKyV1cS8n0OtbnroTXT7aVmtF1QHFrhMrgsYXVBEL2kHCt7EszICmJdv s+xlsBteg2Z0R+sSM8rqo5/5uNk20MbRsJi3q8K9+EELyiv0Juth/g7Z7z2XS6S6Sose spiUSGkgCifbsfPvihWqTh8q+4VkkpwMowANNPgqgpUNlyURUvUEVGR+mPRiPjFsDzO3 CdEg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531neHQ4KaCW2A2xpBvfYDr7OooSldCZc7ovnpK/EJAodn/oeKgO 3qFZOJaRQW1c0Mj4uT3Nl21NGyz34wOyt6QfpLRdvnHV X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy1v5PEqxQXs0sC7o78fvJjYTFvvpWx4JEqYyiU/P1OBo89EbkZRJMGf/sWaEUUKLrbcqM9ia76n6QpdXUTJT4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2444:b0:4ab:15b9:20e5 with SMTP id d4-20020a056a00244400b004ab15b920e5mr4880270pfj.0.1639775442356; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 13:10:42 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 13:10:41 -0800 In-Reply-To: <83h7b7c6ge.fsf@gnu.org> X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2607:f8b0:4864:20::42f (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::42f; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pf1-x42f.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:282237 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > . if this annoys you so much, then why not change the value in your > own configuration? why do you insist to change the default? I have tried to explain in this thread how the current behavior is surprising and bad. Others have done so also. What I have in my own configuration is not relevant in that regard, I think. > . and if we eventually do change the default, why so early in the > pretest? why not closer to the release? I don't have an opinion about the timing, but I do think it should happen before Emacs 28.1. > . and since when 5 vs 1 out of 8 means "by popular demand"? My claim was that 5 out of 8 is not "just one voice". As I already said, I won't insist further so I will be bowing out of this thread now. Thanks.