From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove obsolete fast-lock and lazy-lock libraries Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 07:51:40 -0700 Message-ID: References: <83364v5j28.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2mm4n07.fsf@gnu.org> <83ft8t43og.fsf@gnu.org> <835z9noh13.fsf@gnu.org> <831rkboez0.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6yymzvy.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34663"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, jnorden@tntech.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 13 16:52:17 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k6EaX-0008uS-8k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 16:52:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50182 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k6EaW-0006kj-0T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 10:52:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57252) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k6Ea0-0006KD-76 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 10:51:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yb1-xb41.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::b41]:33525) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k6EZy-0005Ua-RH; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 10:51:43 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yb1-xb41.google.com with SMTP id p191so3471225ybg.0; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 07:51:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BzIzmtfYy+zYqI2S4y8PdDzYeylrHwInAgUmzkm7tkk=; b=ZHNMwJGVAp3rYdtf5TxACMDRu88gln6wdZq7CNOhJvxrC22n7LAdzXR0/xXdCvcmKs AR6bHLPsVlPU9O2B66WociEJBzv+xVNANVVHKWNn07nmrvrN+G2OFaDb0sX4k6y6zlyM JW5HKtnlpebiupv5fhZSJBzKO7JGmEQ74vHPF75eQ4gv0QQL3spnibMIvEPLnhlvhoXr i/aTZIRu8IVx2Mm1MTV4udFKYvf+YrzrdFfb4R3H6MblrmthHlJTTcuUpoY2fQQ2U5S1 auAI3rISzrVtdOneK1r+Tb7VDdRJY2GgmXWO2oylUpRNG0DpHjXXOtcXsIJD66tG9Yu4 zNSQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BzIzmtfYy+zYqI2S4y8PdDzYeylrHwInAgUmzkm7tkk=; b=M6JFf3AUbOcYsMoOmoY5YranYcuik5/HpMKFkUa4fVK/KiHCoKr0/iQTxuVgB4LLxs SW8ErJNacEXQA/tRflLfPnOcskXvX38koHwzo6lsMV5JPmFZpiE+AdYp0gvEOOuBlHlZ wxaCj/MU/blTW6iw3bOnx7c7qnA6dTnjqYrtXoBEdIqDbjC0LHrENoJrcERDBFqr1S8k 570UdtUoOPhsSo5nlcbD/bnQvobMpDQPiw7eBY5KPycdP7qQmeRD7tse/wj0spXl+P+Z 1tohbxSpn/hUK9WoE8Vblv5+WDMaypX7rSC2DWpH3BUgmg7NIMocbRBrO/QjrG9vZgOB +KOg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5303+aBkGCzc644n6xE92Ncn6wSsfQWbeIvzLd+Cg6oSnibaWbUh NfwLzSuyV7VmSQ/TMfrZvQtjMohQYbRkKBbRubPMhJtGL1A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJws+R93jVELrQ/hEZD3FguHK+GwJwvlqk2IvAR4ICEgxmGotZoLXKwnDqerTfH/UKXdIHxPQ81S4n8yWytKSX8= X-Received: by 2002:a25:7007:: with SMTP id l7mr7018558ybc.85.1597330301396; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 07:51:41 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 07:51:40 -0700 In-Reply-To: <83a6yymzvy.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::b41; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-yb1-xb41.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:253736 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Sorry for not being more clear. I meant deleting > font-lock-support-mode: it must be declared obsolete first (which > would require adding the command proposed by Stefan), then, after some > obsolescence time, we could delete font-lock-support-mode, and then we > can delete fast-lock and fuzzy-lock. Ah, okay. So if I understand correctly we should not pull the trigger on deleting the libraries fast-lock and fuzzy-lock until we have first obsoleted and, at a later date, deleted font-lock-support-mode. Best regards, Stefan Kangas