From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Abysmal state of GTK build Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 13:26:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ilmlluxq.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <87ilmlluxq.fsf@yahoo.com> <83h725deo3.fsf@gnu.org> <87bksdltah.fsf@yahoo.com> <87r119bni8.fsf@gmail.com> <87v8ql4kwk.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87tu65ilq2.fsf@telefonica.net> <87fshpgjsg.fsf@yahoo.com> <87edx7a9n9.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9256"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Richard Stallman , =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= , Emacs developers To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 23 13:27:57 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oQS4Z-0002Fk-Ce for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 13:27:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34076 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQS4Y-0006l1-Dc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 07:27:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50560) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQS3X-0005ZW-VL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 07:26:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ua1-f49.google.com ([209.85.222.49]:39699) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQS3W-0000Qj-Em; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 07:26:51 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ua1-f49.google.com with SMTP id i5so5416827uat.6; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 04:26:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=QVOALNNvGlvHxf72BugHD4I3hNMxpBhO2Qr0sQ149UM=; b=s0FQ6afS0LN9Ao9GdU/fmk/6864Uu7ECBxtFErYYJOoom1gpytSXikX1SAGTKycyS9 dKBLlO121h9FfMpeVIRQZ0FbJlMzfOeiZo8M1yGgD9QpWJxp8w9RaxcpnStilEbd2mhQ iOEY3HBMXqi2NjgGmdZnUi4ZXXv/7k3vUuLNf5lXjfd0yDr81vM+KDdzUzvNg9lIGmU3 4r56lZHfd5NouvL2oFTvAQf97U2XfYjGNIHPDQpIFUMqHu7OSiOeiabviQhELMwV5E5D BRbx9TU8SFYlMzILBsJX9FtEqz/pwFZvX9NNqiEG3Fbysatgz7Cu3/P6qyM9zsdaA2US Kb/A== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3yjLmMcesPkQJimyBKalCajxErPp7Feo7f705W8qBWVd7Vckdv fHsB++uzEaonGhVe9DSkrqqtRyYAV548UTN6WeY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6nAB/DkxPiloxSMBppr1HZVoYM7hVzI9RDxCrVypqsFgLUkptvmUkgD9lWGJ5VW0MeMf8hxjpjt97czHx0twU= X-Received: by 2002:a9f:2f0c:0:b0:38c:6559:3c5d with SMTP id x12-20020a9f2f0c000000b0038c65593c5dmr9304458uaj.121.1661254007577; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 04:26:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87edx7a9n9.fsf@yahoo.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.222.49; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-ua1-f49.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:293864 Archived-At: Po Lu writes: > Sure. I wasn't aware that convention also applies to C++ files. I > think I can also come up with shorter names for those files as well Do we really need those file names to be shorter?