From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [nongnu] elpa/rainbow-delimiters a32b39bdfe: Add license file with GPLv3 Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2022 20:34:37 -0500 Message-ID: References: <164107430330.17202.17260845381664886032@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220101215824.BB13CC0DEC3@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21658"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 02 02:35:51 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n3pmp-0005Q3-Hj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 02 Jan 2022 02:35:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32996 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n3pmo-0008S2-8U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2022 20:35:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55460) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n3plh-0007kc-25 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2022 20:34:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-f47.google.com ([209.85.216.47]:33514) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n3plf-0003yF-FS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2022 20:34:40 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-f47.google.com with SMTP id g11-20020a17090a7d0b00b001b2c12c7273so4578679pjl.0 for ; Sat, 01 Jan 2022 17:34:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wB6bPYeVFcF91ExtfXAK2mSBWlR1P3XZ8r3gwmZVtm4=; b=jkBtZuc6whEhq+Big3HeE85Q19/Xl4R5KZ4nT1teP/kr674/4Cj3sM817guHNMbU0i KUpE8Q1K4+mpswbpC51wfbQDVfOWbOBL+PjxDMC8OyEnl4OmIS++o9Hthi8pSVmprrjT gbEmAVtyHhivq7QcmAL7jRHRWyB5se1dqFrG0vTH8bE22bM7EFchEcZe2rbxURNeTh0U fSbcI5fFjTx2FZuJh6p6JOXBkx83qkA/+liU4MjQR+4etD+qWGv0Vb3+WnvsN1ay+IDb QUsR6jQ5RwcRs+GBTCMiScWLJoU0xH05sq/cFx4VvzNFDplnSyjMp1JLVX41AhyMTYNz a5Iw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531V6fObys6xxyU1pLtEC2jYUr3FGQPcjlIf2hsJDCCmQjrna4DL oMFyjLEYdwRNDbvPA0gp6xc+TeFk2cRdlKcfZ+IIR43q X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy3w35BL/dE8S2DeVtzx3eF3Jf4eujX2/XHpEflyOuyPj/3DpfR26m8pBxhRytHlKaPWEMY89sGdEAfJTV+2nw= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d512:b0:149:3070:48ec with SMTP id b18-20020a170902d51200b00149307048ecmr39638831plg.66.1641087278285; Sat, 01 Jan 2022 17:34:38 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sat, 1 Jan 2022 20:34:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.216.47; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pj1-f47.google.com X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.5 / 5.0 requ) FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:283842 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > I'd rather not, especially since some packages may be using some > other license, in which case we shouldn't just skip them. OK, makes sense. I will add the license file to :ignored-files for the packages where I sent pull requests. (I won't go around closing the ones that remain open, but I'll update the recipes.) What do you think about ignoring globally some of the other files I mentioned? We already ignore e.g. ".git" and ".gitignore", so I would say those would be analogous. I could write up a patch.