From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Anand Tamariya Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GNU Emacs as a lightweight IDE (seeking volunteers) Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 10:58:05 +0530 Message-ID: References: <7c108354-1512-ac9b-9199-39f927f47045@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000045632705bd13d1f8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11493"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 09 06:29:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lJUve-0002rD-Jr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 06:29:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53560 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJUvd-0004rO-MI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:29:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43982) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJUur-0004PR-Kw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:28:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-io1-xd33.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d33]:44725) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJUup-0000lP-KK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:28:21 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-io1-xd33.google.com with SMTP id 81so12588282iou.11 for ; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 21:28:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Q4Wxbs1uY6bw9QQjQUZBC7WtXhqqjjoQC0s6d2f2JWU=; b=pRN+QlERzCfA4WnDJqy21KjbFgzY56zNZGAKTh1SUUYhHK7ZVd6tb4M2Cb22GO7cgh jD4v2gwTKfUyo4/Tu8+rAE8JTB2lg/UwNiGvldR2zWxom8gut2GwE9qS65dXc/999FfM ul59poh5q7sb5ITT8aASjHkYzXO0xdn1+G2VeUPCU7G5qBesqd+5Pw7toQUOcwbV+9K4 fJ00cyM2sIE2yoFKn0mnhNxsCz06Uncn5wEnY7cg0xIqMzAjy6Z2xt01ILjg4/BHxUa2 1ZlScdAFLhuYbqNReS7iCw0iWA/r1jAVctFO0NColC0idAz/yAys5VpF0p0COe9GkbAZ krrw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Q4Wxbs1uY6bw9QQjQUZBC7WtXhqqjjoQC0s6d2f2JWU=; b=YYaC4OvjbveKyzxg6nQQG9tQtzFzZybXGTWtGLgQtG53zlRKVSJ6376/dhx3NxRgTH r7gSE30cp4O14s46ld/ahXrQWfyY3Z+rQeaeBQBDMcRWOH4VAB98bPXaLRduxc0PXyrq JZcFD2AppikdchPcvQC4MifAbTcvQ41+bgERC+VC9IUZqvCB8GCeYRnJRelPRw+gIOek O8kmhNJ8eC+UsZprwz9n9VkySPTKlxVZ4r2DhNz/bZihNo05nL6+qEM4EmvAkfbwLBQT tf9Ivdb2DBOKZCFU0oLZSzyPbQWcKG+j0ZVT517RHWksWEg6YIqBsF/MlijO2f4pQ1Kt XKOw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532RJESOoiv5Na46wxjEZDiQpGHACgjJ1X/3frQSK4bs8kHjx6uF mye5CH72UmkiT8bSKlE863dzbOD26vXzxCJsRwU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwLiCPjLxvL765M/d/tas6SYS3UnX7j3hwWiorcQHDT/FdxufmVsUaGYB3nOlfZiWc1qjMOd/uQDfmXObq87Ck= X-Received: by 2002:a02:a90f:: with SMTP id n15mr27452476jam.110.1615267696565; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 21:28:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7c108354-1512-ac9b-9199-39f927f47045@yandex.ru> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::d33; envelope-from=atamariya@gmail.com; helo=mail-io1-xd33.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266228 Archived-At: --00000000000045632705bd13d1f8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > Before that, it might be helpful to post them in a branch for anyone who > might want to take a look, to give a pre-review, so to speak. > It's available in gitlab branch https://gitlab.com/atamariya/emacs/-/tree/dev . If you want it in some other repo, can you provide me access to that repo? Relatedly, while looking through your /compare/master...dev link, I > noticed some questionable changes, though. Like some commented-out code, > or checked in company-semantic.el (did you add some extra features to > it?), or changes to a number of files in /progmodes/ (!). These should > have to go, unless accompanied with real good justifications. > Changes to company-semantic.el will of course go into company package. It's presently in my repo for my convenience. I've added some post-completion and template changes (eg SQL). Changes to some files (e.g. in progmodes) is the reason why I want atleast couple of more users to test the functionality. I don't want to push some changes that might have wide impact on the basis of my individual testing alone. What if some existing functionality is breaking that I'm unaware of (something that I don't use)? --00000000000045632705bd13d1f8 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Before that, it might be helpful to post them in a branch for anyone who might want to take a look, to give a pre-review, so to speak.

Relatedly, while looking through your /compare/master...dev link, I
noticed some questionable changes, though. Like some commented-out code, or checked in company-semantic.el (did you add some extra features to
it?), or changes to a number of files in /progmodes/ (!). These should
have to go, unless accompanied with real good justifications.
Changes to company-semantic.el will of course go into company packa= ge. It's presently in my repo for my convenience. I've added some p= ost-completion and template changes (eg SQL).
Changes to some= files (e.g. in progmodes) is the reason why I want atleast couple of more = users to test the functionality. I don't want to push some changes that= might have wide impact on the basis of my individual testing alone. What i= f some existing functionality is breaking that I'm unaware of (somethin= g that I don't use)?

--00000000000045632705bd13d1f8--