From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "T.V. Raman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Info: Console Vs GUI difference? Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:46:25 -0700 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383169599 2780 80.91.229.3 (30 Oct 2013 21:46:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:46:39 +0000 (UTC) To: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 30 22:46:44 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vbdb6-0008Ig-B2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 22:46:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54552 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vbdb6-00068g-0m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 17:46:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36042) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vbdax-00067I-T4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 17:46:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vbdas-0006M0-3f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 17:46:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qe0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c02::234]:36228) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vbdar-0006Lu-Vv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 17:46:26 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qe0-f52.google.com with SMTP id w7so1245221qeb.11 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:46:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=fSbMUQn34rDk2vAKV7S9AYGcU0wSK65bqekcrXc2WgQ=; b=cwUDRUKQ0unIzVokMfhQKudoiB9Lub9mgkCmeCMyTy3tTZDCmgV5MzGMtNc0txlho5 6YlGjmIE8d1jkiFzT542K6FOR5vYjx+OMCZ6f2or6eEqLgdcYDNh57gTXnDua9tY4QEC dRLFGCqKPxwk+8KzG+qU1Qa9IH40mBgKl3sMRn2xdbItJpBeCe7+r1lENqYnRExJQDOy NwEolKxJS0Gf20mQLgjCUHdLBvUMY3OBBKAh5mVJFv6oQWjIVHq+/o+YROx7rxQ/5i6i 1dnL7AW4/5BRGXP2cbRupn5buZlcU7Szw4zgaHe8gJRmZrBQtqpfVFfSFv1QSk2Bk51X 2PAg== X-Received: by 10.49.71.131 with SMTP id v3mr5917183qeu.85.1383169585509; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:46:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.229.171.135 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:46:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400d:c02::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:164717 Archived-At: Debug on signal t doesn't catch this which is why it's proving a bear to debug. -- -- On 10/30/13, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Once Emacs has triggered the user error in Info as before, what >> I'm observing that when in the info buffer (and only in the info >> buffer) something in Emacs appears to be calling signal under the >> covers -- and the signal is trapped and suppressed >> **after**after every user action. > > I can't reproduce it here. At least (setq debug-on-signal t) doesn't > show me any signal thrown. Which signal is thrown? Does (setq > debug-on-signal t) catch it? If so, what does the backtrace say? > > > Stefan >