From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "T.V. Raman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: insert-char and post-self-insert-hook Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:37:42 -0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1359070671 14597 80.91.229.3 (24 Jan 2013 23:37:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 23:37:51 +0000 (UTC) To: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 25 00:38:10 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TyWMz-00043C-SM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 00:38:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59832 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyWMi-0001O6-FZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:37:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46211) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyWMb-0001Nu-V9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:37:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyWMZ-0004JQ-2u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:37:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ve0-f177.google.com ([209.85.128.177]:52668) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyWMY-0004JI-Tp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:37:42 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ve0-f177.google.com with SMTP id m1so582784ves.22 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:37:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=saJzsoePUdm7FC8lI/P9HUS4S/m7UDpSxuJzYfBdi+4=; b=mkD+0hBHxRnYjsk/qO6KWQK7XHkIbZlJn0XdqRfSIuzxIRyGMF7fQAA4Ut9gxmnoWd +O5JAi6/kDgVbbKxAjNbOU7RygVxlYxr+F6dz0FARvhj1nS6lMQhO7cmQD9Hfe4ckR31 KBm0wToLn6KPFztLIil+FaNNTC4kjwdjSZOFuosBHxJPdPKUCmFcXVwRg4Z8uCQXrm+w AlnNW8r7QRgpy5i/eJJMp1Ou0kv9YIYkyr2obZ6W1MvwXnNXmg4UNMFD/yAT9eveSHjW S7gVaAqWQCiMbUX4dxF68SX8daj/Mzm6U+q6kY1K5dq1EGNbDyUq5zlPW9vudkSN7KKt 7NtQ== X-Received: by 10.52.69.229 with SMTP id h5mr3513654vdu.127.1359070662384; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:37:42 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.58.38.42 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:37:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.128.177 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:156626 Archived-At: Thanks -- which would save me one explicit advice call:-) On 1/24/13, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Q: Should insert-char call post-self-insert-hook (doesn't at >> present) to be mutually consistent with self-insert-char -- >> reasoning: > > I guess we could make insert-char use self-insert-command instead of > insert, indeed. > > > Stefan >