From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "T.V. Raman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Info: Console Vs GUI difference? Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 18:39:25 -0700 Message-ID: References: <83eh70as37.fsf@gnu.org> <837gcrc10q.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383356370 10247 80.91.229.3 (2 Nov 2013 01:39:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 01:39:30 +0000 (UTC) To: Eli Zaretskii , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 02 02:39:33 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VcQBZ-0002po-GE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 02:39:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40399 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcQBY-00081G-CP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 21:39:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcQBV-000817-0y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 21:39:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcQBT-0003Nz-Mf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 21:39:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oa0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c02::229]:58245) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcQBS-0003NZ-1f; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 21:39:26 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id o9so5355393oag.28 for ; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 18:39:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=hvmxBOmxkW4SYXqMRlvo0bZuBwk3lLfM5ZWaYFuzmTM=; b=P9iJiiCiiU+yCzWJwemiFHsodPSCBPTS5Ex1Z90fN6UOTsQyUlM87RrEEhE/uPVNzR YtoQ3tWRlzixYvVG5E5Zd/Cxkg/yf90d3tTGDSe1l6oDnbZPNayKgYdA4RiNgGsoH+Pg 0+4uLkPIfiqcgrTGbP8Lm/PsWz00viDXqQuS/G6n/HDCBibm0cSeaoEPNFGWmzxwWLfH PDwhTNykmiKr64DD76IuJve3MrwSnxp6ZiD8QF8G/6IMVG7H+t17yl7GIQFWweovXwA7 aKWZKMLP1C/eJ1ErCTbYroFcGd6BPTOz0i10RClgb4UC5pB93JgWPv+ple/SmSfYAEAy 5mqg== X-Received: by 10.182.142.37 with SMTP id rt5mr39102obb.76.1383356365273; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 18:39:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.182.33.229 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 18:39:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <837gcrc10q.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c02::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:164842 Archived-At: For now I've worked around the problem by disabling tool-bar-mode -- --- tool-bar-mode is something I dont personally care about as a non-mouse-waving human -- however I would still say that tool-bar-mode is probably doing more work than it should - in the way it's getting called through redisplay. Disabling the tool-bar in emacspeak likely affects low-vision users, so this would be good to fix. -- Best Regards, --raman On 11/1/13, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 13:24:47 -0700 >> From: "T.V. Raman" >> >> With all due respect, I believe you're wrong here -- that's not >> the problem. And it works correctly at the console. When >> running under X, the signal once raised, gets raised repeatedly >> after every user command, and the backtrace shows that it's >> coming from redisplay. > > It comes from redisplay because redisplay recomputes the menu and > tool-bar items. As the tool bar is not displayed in a TTY session, > you don't get signals then. > > The root cause is still that 'signal' is being advised in a way that > exposes it to the user. >