From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nikolai Weibull Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: compilation-error-regexp-alist-alist gnu entry for Ruby could maybe be better Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:52:54 +0200 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1318931593 23670 80.91.229.12 (18 Oct 2011 09:53:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:53:13 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs Developers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 18 11:53:09 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RG6M8-0005YK-RZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:53:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55000 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RG6M8-0002G4-BZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:53:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48069) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RG6M2-0002Fx-Qf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:53:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RG6Lx-0005J4-9S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pz0-f47.google.com ([209.85.210.47]:58020) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RG6Lx-0005It-2t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:52:57 -0400 Original-Received: by pzd13 with SMTP id 13so1258530pzd.6 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 02:52:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IAsXRWgE8jOYhoJ2cWP/xAq0fh3j/DCbGlAFqG9JxO8=; b=MyGClx9A37eMJ3X42tTaGQ23aFTzMrMcHXFph3bJkCcAkS0pD4nnrlREPG6RHxNbg7 otINZI2rj6FNc+tM7qeA4W22hKQM0F0oi47dxxMpK83KGA7W2q+UPJoYzN1Cy7jd8Zpg ObVss0DdzEO35bUCBoboZ4pQwH0Rr0JOzypCo= Original-Received: by 10.68.208.229 with SMTP id mh5mr3739932pbc.124.1318931574768; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 02:52:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.68.47.40 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 02:52:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Sender-Auth: Ed2bGXKkIv4ZtASKVvzJitYp1IY X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.210.47 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:145294 Archived-At: Hi! The part of the gnu entry in compilation-error-regexp-alist-alist that deals with Ruby backtrace output could perhaps be better. I would say that the =E2=80=9Cin=E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9Cfrom=E2=80=9D lines are informat= ion lines, not error lines and should thus be marked as such. They are very useful to have, but I generally don=E2=80=99t want to walk a, sometimes rather deep, backtrace with next-error. Thanks!