From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vin Shelton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 10 unexpected results Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 14:39:38 -0500 Message-ID: References: <8335z0amsw.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d0939405b909b143" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35544"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 16 20:44:24 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l0rUk-00097Z-UX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 20:44:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38108 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l0rUj-0003cH-Vd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 14:44:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33370) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l0rTM-0003C8-Qp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 14:42:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-f49.google.com ([209.85.208.49]:43066) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l0rTL-00086D-5R; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 14:42:56 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-f49.google.com with SMTP id by27so13273228edb.10; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 11:42:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jSA5P+hTOh3RA1f10gKNT88JCbIuRCxNi7iICp02Tic=; b=UpZksGndaN/VGopf7Zjhg6UwSd72kmLbW8EESJFNMeTYxLz4KiHLz2lUeXz6FKqVfL WixbmIEGDdDMsy70k3k0YYqTJkX4vp0ioSTH9ZeIUxCYlOiKk7bV7Bi8l1V50cFJsuWP DdFcAQaFfquc92xNE+R4C2tgW82ijBqpua/B7SC8cJkwor6LfLCMJJfJUWaXTne20ndZ r44QcaRE7lpcCzS6M2QzbTb66B5qaWA8RWChYKOGJtx5DTyuzdcSts31gylx8im4iiFl d0T50lhUsW2mFHFMXA3sPS/NuHdALKJsXUuI8SSokWHtpkFmVy9sz7/EMgOm+13IrZfj 0CRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531IMIaYZCy5P6DDff5GdGrIMFb+uvq+6yZwjZWnN/4D+V/zAh3R vAOcPAws8KRWXQyBPn/DQXLnLcH6wiW9owXQrYe6v+eh X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz8+/EJSk9oVmPQXenPLBQWtdP2ErK3X8Q2jE0+v/TLVHUNSeYJ3bm1JZFc7W0w3IRma94AI4TeHducP9bnnko= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:22ba:: with SMTP id cx26mr377256edb.350.1610826172632; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 11:42:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8335z0amsw.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.208.49; envelope-from=ethersoft@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-f49.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263107 Archived-At: --000000000000d0939405b909b143 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Linux - my distro is Manjaro. But on re-running the test I only see the final three failures, as you noted. Sorry for the noise. - Vin On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 11:06 AM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Vin Shelton > > Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 10:29:06 -0500 > > > > Running the latest sources with BLDDIR = SRCDIR: > > Ran 4617 tests, 4567 results as expected, 10 unexpected, 40 skipped > > Please always tell which version of Emacs is that. I'm guessing > 28.0.50 in this case. > > > 2 unexpected results: > > FAILED bytecomp/warn-obsolete-hook\.el > > FAILED bytecomp/warn-obsolete-variable\.el > > > > 5 unexpected results: > > FAILED xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defgeneric-el > > FAILED xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defun-defvar-el > > FAILED xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defun-el > > FAILED xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defvar-el > > FAILED xref-elisp-test-find-defs-feature-el > > > > 3 unexpected results: > > FAILED xdisp-tests--window-text-pixel-size > > FAILED xdisp-tests--window-text-pixel-size-leading-space > > FAILED xdisp-tests--window-text-pixel-size-trailing-space > > I can only reproduce the last 3, and it's a known problem being worked > on as we speak. The other tests all pass for me. On what OS are you? > > Thanks. > --000000000000d0939405b909b143 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Linux - my distro is Manjaro.

But on re-running the test I only see the fina= l three failures, as you noted.

= Sorry for the noise.

=C2=A0 - Vi= n

On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 11:06 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-l= eft:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">> From: Vin Shelton <= ;acs@alumni.p= rinceton.edu>
> Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 10:29:06 -0500
>
> Running the latest sources with BLDDIR =3D SRCDIR:
> Ran 4617 tests, 4567 results as expected, 10 unexpected, 40 skipped
Please always tell which version of Emacs is that.=C2=A0 I'm guessing 28.0.50 in this case.

> 2 unexpected results:
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 FAILED=C2=A0 bytecomp/warn-obsolete-hook\.el
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 FAILED=C2=A0 bytecomp/warn-obsolete-variable\.el
>
> 5 unexpected results:
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 FAILED=C2=A0 xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defgeneric-el
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 FAILED=C2=A0 xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defun-defvar-el >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 FAILED=C2=A0 xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defun-el
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 FAILED=C2=A0 xref-elisp-test-find-defs-defvar-el
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 FAILED=C2=A0 xref-elisp-test-find-defs-feature-el
>
> 3 unexpected results:
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 FAILED=C2=A0 xdisp-tests--window-text-pixel-size
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 FAILED=C2=A0 xdisp-tests--window-text-pixel-size-leading-= space
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 FAILED=C2=A0 xdisp-tests--window-text-pixel-size-trailing= -space

I can only reproduce the last 3, and it's a known problem being worked<= br> on as we speak.=C2=A0 The other tests all pass for me.=C2=A0 On what OS are= you?

Thanks.
--000000000000d0939405b909b143--