From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Carsten Mattner Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Update on the Emacs release schedule? Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 18:02:36 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87vcookmxd.fsf@gnu.org> <87hb07r5gr.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325955777 25297 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2012 17:02:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 17:02:57 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 07 18:02:47 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RjZfG-0000xT-GL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 18:02:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52440 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjZfF-0003r6-HU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 12:02:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58338) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjZfC-0003r1-JH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 12:02:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjZfB-0000UI-7N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 12:02:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:47260) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjZfB-0000UE-3M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 12:02:37 -0500 Original-Received: by iacb35 with SMTP id b35so5105076iac.0 for ; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 09:02:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=m8OwznnCVXia7dZN+sb2VI3NBgEJH7+Kz+HCWEQM+/M=; b=ainzRmHR+vJfffaC/z0dJZRdtXoSl6xaXLezVn/EVh+RkbA7Sa7b6/2yioLMBO+nvU B0QlwmaLsirWwQSejUyu5pwmm9W9WOCxdxth4cf0vrIzjAJe5cGFJ8zYP0ha+PtP3q5k uoEt3Pv6p9KfpSjUbyjA3vU9DOtRcp3PfoPNo= Original-Received: by 10.50.195.129 with SMTP id ie1mr11830521igc.29.1325955756142; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 09:02:36 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.50.106.132 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 09:02:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87hb07r5gr.fsf@lifelogs.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.210.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147453 Archived-At: 2012/1/7 Ted Zlatanov : > On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 12:02:59 +0100 Carsten Mattner wrote: > > CM> Reading Tom Tromey's recent blog post, I'd say any improvements > CM> to the allocator and/or collector will be a huge NEWS entry for 24. > > The post can be found at http://tromey.com/blog/?p=709 and is worth a read. Some of the comments on tromey.com and at http://news.ycombinator.net/item?id=3433424 plus http://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/o5yx9/ seem to not know the current state of Guile's elisp branch and even more some seem to dismiss Guile as inferior to cmucl/sbcl while explaining the non-adoption of Common Lisp in Emacs with a missing "good" GNU Common Lisp implementation. I don't know, but that sounds like uninformed ranting to me.