From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tianxiang Xiong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposal: font lock for `describe-variable` Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:30:18 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1474949378.32234.5.camel@gmail.com> <83shslbax3.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c094476a3ab40053d7fc22a X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474993889 31326 195.159.176.226 (27 Sep 2016 16:31:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 16:31:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, =?UTF-8?B?Q2zDqW1lbnQgUGl0LS1DbGF1ZGVs?= To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 27 18:31:24 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bovHs-0007AA-Mq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 18:31:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52247 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bovHr-00063r-4s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:31:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54522) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bovGw-00062s-7e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:30:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bovGv-0005v8-CP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:30:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yb0-x22b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c09::22b]:33259) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bovGt-0005rQ-MI; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:30:19 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yb0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id 2so6945596ybv.0; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:30:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/mqgu5tdHeY7xKynW6VqrirwysNxE+bFXk0x0xz7VuU=; b=N1pAqfDgVlg9ZimBWt0UR9e68Hwb+pWBup1YIPAJe4FRar8T/6uaPBv9n7iAw2Vq3P uD/5/DOb+xDrajOvZbialJZMSO6a9DO1VlQaVW/8/esRt4xCTfPLI8TUmUlXV6qWG/Lu J/tys62QVitZ/+U/HyA444oVoNtYPZNxgARs+S8ZCrJ1jnwq57Mp3op/rkPelDMDfN3N 8czF9bKAGkOBwSGRIDdPiNYd2wGr6Z+IKlGT30n9oel8za1VFvvlH+NbXRUPCGhsKlhw p9zeNNP7QVzj3ochrRoGFumUzGW3VBsLWomv7m1wJAjt6F33nHOlukC1HPdseGuCnNfj 7c8A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/mqgu5tdHeY7xKynW6VqrirwysNxE+bFXk0x0xz7VuU=; b=WCsfiVvps+RsD5CqJRZ5bjLJtDiMFPcJ02gcjCzYYmYbzv5Uw0qtgaZ0t5eMejvj63 df7DtHrfbkm2ClMD8GFT0bDw3skAIlVif3sjMwgmaQtRAAAKLXT/uNWSa+DcPVPY3TJZ vV31w4FhUsABDKFyGFHCBArh4RZfI6O7LgCLoFLQyRgL1VJuQmWD3BJYljQN8oXWzUbm jgS4viScJtG0dpmGBMkhuF+ja82KeX84wC322okpQbKzuGKGHDlGUztbm9xr1nJ23Bmm oSMXZiTLBBk+wiPqeMfskOxr0KHnusB4u1lL3hgBG7ZstPuKTl8eVwBqpb293oNLF26O 6iiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPxx6kGQP6u+D7pBfbeofbKhkDSKKa7WOGfFV8CDqq57O+8ogwg3jX2PfSUKsiwYl62+lvWeYXRSOB1rg== X-Received: by 10.37.75.198 with SMTP id y189mr21606116yba.146.1474993819198; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:30:19 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.129.104.67 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:30:18 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.129.104.67 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:30:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83shslbax3.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4002:c09::22b X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207837 Archived-At: --94eb2c094476a3ab40053d7fc22a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Even the 0002 version? On Sep 27, 2016 8:49 AM, "Eli Zaretskii" wrote: > > From: Tianxiang Xiong > > Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 21:09:38 -0700 > > > > Would anyone care to take a look at the revised version of the > > proposal? It's in another e-mail on this thread. > > Could you perhaps send a patch without the whitespace changes? It > looks like most of the diffs are due to whitespace, which makes it > hard to see the real changes. > > Thanks. > --94eb2c094476a3ab40053d7fc22a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Even the 0002 version?


On Sep 27, 2016 8= :49 AM, "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@= gnu.org> wrote:
> From: Tianxiang Xiong <tianxiang.xiong@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 21:09:38 -0700
>
> Would anyone care to take a look at the revised version of the
> proposal? It's in another e-mail on this thread.

Could you perhaps send a patch without the whitespace changes?=C2=A0 It
looks like most of the diffs are due to whitespace, which makes it
hard to see the real changes.

Thanks.
--94eb2c094476a3ab40053d7fc22a--