Well, english is not my first language. Of course, I hope not to get used
to them :))

On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 21:41, dalanicolai <dalanicolai@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Eli.
>
> Also, I realize now, that sizeof works differently on an array and a
> pointer (to an array) (AFAIU).
> I guess I will slowly or quickly get used to these (initial) pitfalls.
>
>
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 21:10, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> > From: dalanicolai <dalanicolai@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 21:05:22 +0100
>> >
>> > Ah okay, well I am completely new to C, so I am still finding out
>> things (e.g. I have not 'actively' used
>> > ptrdiff yet).
>> > But indeed the 'nargs' just give the number of passed args (obviously).
>> >
>> > I had checked the 'sizeof' the args array when passing an argument and
>> without passing an
>> > argument,
>> > and it was the same. Then the docs mention that NARGS is the 'required'
>> number of arguments,
>> > I had misunderstood it a little (of course the required number is
>> variable, but somehow I assumed it
>> > would be 1 in this case). So sometimes I overlook the 'obvious', and
>> because I had spent some time
>> > on testing
>> > things already, I decided to just ask here.
>>
>> The args[] array gets allocated exactly to accommodate nargs
>> arguments, so you should never access args[] beyond the index nargs-1.
>>
>> > Anyway, as usual, thanks for your quick and helpful answer!
>>
>> You're welcome.
>>
>