unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Tim Cross <theophilusx@gmail.com>
To: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
Cc: david.reitter@gmail.com, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
	dan.colascione@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: New build process?
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:58:43 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAC=50j9btNE4cOLq00ZzBgYndcU=mvi5rH44P5qqxqU0ZQNg-A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANbX364LtwkGxgKOzKrBW1h==izX9kNGQGAWCeDhSF99mbgTmg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Lennart Borgman
<lennart.borgman@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 15:11, Tim Cross <theophilusx@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm actually with Richard on this one.  I think the need to install,
>>> update, and use any additional commands before "./configure; make" is
>>> a nuisance whose justification is questionable at best.  It's just
>>> that I gave up on talking people into catering to us dinosaurs whose
>>> paradise was lost, and Richard is still trying, because he's a better
>>> man than I am.
>>>
>>
>> If you believe you can do it and make it solid (which I expect you
>> can), then go for it. I personally don't think it is necessary as we
>> are talking about users who are choosing to interact at a low
>> development level, which IMO is a moving target subject to change and
>> instability. We should not set the bar too high here - put our efforts
>> into improving emacs and not into improving the build process for
>> those who chose to interact at this level.
>>
>> Yes, I guess I would be considered a dinosaur and possibly not even a
>
> Dear dinosaur, can't you believe making the build process simple saves
> a lot of time for many developers? And then it is possible for them to
> improve Emacs even more. (Everything that makes Emacs more stable may
> save a lot of time.)
>

Come ojn - this is really getting out of scale.

Currently, to build from bzr you need to run ./autogen.sh to generate
the configure script. One simple additional command. Its not
complicated, its not hard - one *SIMPLE* step.

If we were talking about something that was complicated or a lot of
people had trouble with, I would understand. In reality, this thread
was really kicked off simply because the status quo had changed very
slightly and someone was frustrated that this was not obvious to them
and caused them to waste time. The reality is that if you are going to
choose to work at this level, you are likely to see change and it is
even likely to be unstable change from time to time.

Get over it, move on, there is nothing to see here!

Tim



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-27 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-26 18:42 New build process? Alan Mackenzie
2011-07-26 18:47 ` David Kastrup
2011-07-26 20:00   ` David Reitter
2011-07-26 20:16     ` Daniel Colascione
2011-07-27  2:58       ` Richard Stallman
2011-07-27  3:40         ` Tim Cross
2011-07-27  5:08           ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-07-27  7:58             ` Tim Cross
2011-07-27  8:25               ` Peter Münster
2011-07-27  8:48                 ` Tim Cross
2011-07-27  9:43                   ` Peter Münster
2011-07-27  8:51                 ` David Kastrup
2011-07-27 10:05                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-07-27 10:03               ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-07-27 13:11                 ` Tim Cross
2011-07-27 13:31                   ` Lennart Borgman
2011-07-27 13:56                     ` David Kastrup
2011-07-28 12:37                       ` David De La Harpe Golden
2011-07-28 12:46                         ` David Kastrup
2011-07-29 12:36                           ` Alan Mackenzie
2011-07-27 14:58                     ` Tim Cross [this message]
2011-07-27 16:14                 ` Richard Stallman
2011-07-27 16:25                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-07-27 20:27                 ` Paul Eggert
2011-07-28 10:06                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-07-28 16:45                   ` Richard Stallman
2011-07-27  7:51           ` Andreas Schwab
2011-07-27  8:02             ` Tim Cross
2011-07-27  8:07               ` Andreas Schwab
2011-07-27  8:13                 ` Tim Cross
2011-07-27  8:22                   ` Andreas Schwab
2011-07-27  8:31                     ` Tim Cross
2011-07-27  8:54                     ` David Kastrup
2011-07-27  9:01                       ` Andreas Schwab
2011-07-27  9:15                         ` David Kastrup
2011-07-27  9:41                           ` Andreas Schwab
2011-07-26 20:24     ` David Kastrup
2011-07-26 22:10   ` Alan Mackenzie
2011-07-27 12:15     ` Thien-Thi Nguyen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAC=50j9btNE4cOLq00ZzBgYndcU=mvi5rH44P5qqxqU0ZQNg-A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=theophilusx@gmail.com \
    --cc=dan.colascione@gmail.com \
    --cc=david.reitter@gmail.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=lennart.borgman@gmail.com \
    --cc=rms@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).