Just curious - in what ways is JS worse then Elisp?

I agree Option 1 would give more bang for your buck - at least initially.

On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 at 07:11, Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> wrote:

> On 8/29/20 12:14 PM, Qiantan Hong wrote:
> > Option 1, besides enabling libre.js, can also bring numerous existing
> > cross-browser extensions to Emacs, if we finally support a large enough
> > portion of the Web Extension API. However those extensions are
> > all written in JS and JS is worse than Elisp.
> >
> > Option 2 might require as much work as option 1, but without the
> additional
> > benefit (or drawback?) of bringing other JS extensions.
>
> I'd suggest Option 1 as providing more bang for the buck. I think the FSF
> tech
> staff is looking at LibreJS; see
> <
> https://www.fsf.org/blogs/sysadmin/coming-soon-a-new-site-for-fully-free-collaboration
> >.
>
>

-- 
regards,

Tim

--
Tim Cross