>
> > I'd like to apply the following patch to flip the sense of the prefix
> > argument to interact calls to insert-register. I find the current
> > default behavior of putting point before the inserted text annoying; I
> > want it after more often and don't want to add C-u to an already long
> > key sequence.
>

I seldom use registers but I tried this out right now. I can say for a fact
that I know that, in the way I would use it, if I got into the habit of
 using it, would be to prefer point after the inserted text.

So, for what it's worth: +1.

/Mathias


On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>
wrote:

> I'd like to apply the following patch to flip the sense of the prefix
> argument to interact calls to insert-register. I find the current
> default behavior of putting point before the inserted text annoying; I
> want it after more often and don't want to add C-u to an already long
> key sequence.
>
> Of course, this is an incompatible change to a very old interface, but
> the breakage should be limited to muscle memory and recorded macros.
>
> === modified file 'lisp/register.el'
> --- lisp/register.el    2014-06-03 09:06:18 +0000
> +++ lisp/register.el    2014-09-11 02:24:53 +0000
> @@ -425,13 +425,14 @@
>    "Insert contents of register REGISTER.  (REGISTER is a character.)
>  Normally puts point before and mark after the inserted text.
>  If optional second arg is non-nil, puts mark before and point after.
> -Interactively, second arg is non-nil if prefix arg is supplied.
> +Interactively, second arg is nil if prefix arg is supplied and t
> +otherwise.
>
>  Interactively, reads the register using `register-read-with-preview'."
>    (interactive (progn
>                  (barf-if-buffer-read-only)
>                  (list (register-read-with-preview "Insert register: ")
> -                      current-prefix-arg)))
> +                      (not current-prefix-arg))))
>    (push-mark)
>    (let ((val (get-register register)))
>      (cond
>
>
>
>