From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mathias Dahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unuseful keybindings Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 01:19:27 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87sj73qzvl.fsf@gmail.com> <87623zquvw.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7zdud3.fsf@gmail.com> <87ehiiu5x7.fsf@gnu.org> <876A7D1112084247AE53F7EE42B4587C@us.oracle.com> <80ehih3hlj.fsf@somewhere.org> <87pq21iwrw.fsf@yandex.ru> <87AE81CEB91846DB94BC5F3B40C788DE@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303349d7d5f7f004d17a09a3 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356222002 9521 80.91.229.3 (23 Dec 2012 00:20:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 00:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: public-emacs-devel-mXXj517/zsQ@plane.gmane.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Sebastien Vauban , Dmitry Gutov To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 23 01:20:16 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TmZIe-0001cR-6L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 01:20:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56247 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TmZIP-0005B4-0x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 19:20:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54466) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TmZII-0005Ay-1n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 19:19:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TmZID-0004Pt-36 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 19:19:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com ([209.85.216.182]:37650) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TmZIC-0004Oy-UW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 19:19:49 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id k19so3251546qcs.13 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:19:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=BHc3IW6iPJLGlUswWJZT74B06mQYdr5LNNfPvdpfzsQ=; b=o9SdhzE/q+l1bCWe3Pag6rro5NG9teV/tiX8jojNbcJ7ZXl9DpTq+qx7D8F+lCwSjD VD6A+QCHVTiRWjGGNz3t0JsutyUpekrTf/zVtLkfCo79bUWbn82mrs5K8oY7Lo8z0YUz r7ge5W3Ku/kvLlqZiktjJ8w76ykcPXeEp72/B7FKA3TEs1zEfSShpBD6TYGvRB4Q6xjg WSrw7Qu7OAjEV4P/6So+Cfo8nzm8+/sQOhUxiRYu4mpS78CQX43Rv8kED+S2I+j+09VL Mow8BbA7VEa+Cia5eRjLCUaowgzzpV7xnC92R9IGfUANeSy1hqNhs/Y6KOAAuouGstt6 m4xw== Original-Received: by 10.224.185.138 with SMTP id co10mr8928844qab.97.1356221988075; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:19:48 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.49.81.144 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:19:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87AE81CEB91846DB94BC5F3B40C788DE@us.oracle.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.216.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155791 Archived-At: --20cf303349d7d5f7f004d17a09a3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > I don't think I'm going to use the new binding much, but I > totally support moving toward compatibility with other > > programs, at least where there are no pre-existing keybindings. > > So you buy the argument that if there is no default binding for some key > (ANY > key), and someone uses it conventionally outside Emacs (for ANYthing), then > Emacs should hurry to get on board and have the same binding by default. > Did anyone really say that? To hurry, etc. --20cf303349d7d5f7f004d17a09a3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
> I don't think I'm going to use the new binding much, but I
totally support moving toward compatibility with other
> programs, at least where there are no pre-existing keybindings.

So you buy the argument that if there is no default binding for some key (ANY
key), and someone uses it conventionally outside Emacs (for ANYthing), then
Emacs should hurry to get on board and have the same binding by default.

Did anyone really say that? To hurry, etc.

--20cf303349d7d5f7f004d17a09a3--