From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mathias Dahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Windows barebin distribution Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 13:52:11 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4F8ADAFC.9030308@gmail.com> <831unp0xzq.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c7c6a581ad804cec479eb X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1353243168 5769 80.91.229.3 (18 Nov 2012 12:52:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:52:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Christoph Scholtes , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 18 13:52:56 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ta4Mn-0002VS-IQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 13:52:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49088 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ta4Md-0001fK-CV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 07:52:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49566) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ta4MZ-0001ev-24 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 07:52:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ta4MV-00036a-WE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 07:52:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-vb0-f41.google.com ([209.85.212.41]:53626) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ta4MS-00036J-Fp; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 07:52:32 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-vb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id v13so4866704vbk.0 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 04:52:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=4li1zqjsmmXyd/rE1uPFFUd4802eU75ch8xtniTgJR8=; b=pgW+xlirbC3ABWZrlX7BUGYKXCCbH2r9OqH6an+6f3ha5Ffl/73zobKaJc3seWmnU9 HfLtnxdIMKU6bggVmGqT1G3a+UipKrAJorGYQvBba7eNxG9aVwobaDiwDV/pHUJhqeHK MzfFyPWg7QyEAtnc52jsJBx1ufbIR5fSFWC3l+5iJEEwtgVFdj7f+gfyq/Nj3KsCb0xp EZi5wUxFz+J0NwtzTitdgp0f+QRJqw5P45OLsSYwFZ+0N969lR1e865VOws1I93+g7J+ UClvQULkkJ2NeM4w0KXXGBV1eR6vHu2f99HlNxe0pAaEQJZx6tgC46dL6R9M6byYF7b7 XtLw== Original-Received: by 10.220.156.77 with SMTP id v13mr14659996vcw.62.1353243151571; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 04:52:31 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.58.23.199 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 04:52:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <831unp0xzq.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.212.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154908 Archived-At: --f46d043c7c6a581ad804cec479eb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Would it be possible to check the access logs to see how many people actually download the barebin files? On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 08:28:12 -0600 > > From: Christoph Scholtes > > > > The purpose of the Emacs Windows barebin distribution has been > > questioned a couple of times. Does it still make sense to build it or > > can we save the time and server space? > > I suggest to omit it the next time you produce binaries and see if > anyone complains. > > Thanks. > > --f46d043c7c6a581ad804cec479eb Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Would it be possible to check the access logs to see how many people actual= ly download the barebin files?


On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org= > wrote:
> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 08:28:12 -0600 > From: Christoph Scholtes <cschol2112@googlemail.com>
>
> The purpose of the Emacs Windows barebin distribution has been
> questioned a couple of times. Does it still make sense to build it or<= br> > can we save the time and server space?

I suggest to omit it the next time you produce binaries and see if anyone complains.

Thanks.


--f46d043c7c6a581ad804cec479eb--