I'll stick with emacs-devel anyway and keep contributing to
emacs-tree-sitter too jaja.

it is demoralizing indeed, but it is more not bringing Emacs to the XXI
century. We can do incremental changes after testing how this thing works
—not need to discuss what is and what is not a premature optimization—,
Emacs maintainers can help by making sure major GNU/Linux distributions
ship Emacs with dynamic module feature turned on so the work done on this
side can be rapidly adopted by the community; what's done wrong can be
revisited later.

El jue., 2 de abril de 2020 10:02, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
escribió:

> FWIW, re-reading over the discussions around emacs-tree-sitter of the
> last few days, I must say I'm not proud: if I were a contributor to
> tree-sitter and/or emacs-tree-sitter, all this squabbling over how
> tree-sitter "should" work (from people who have not been involved in
> either of those and don't have any practical experience of how it
> performs or why it's designed that way) would make me run away screaming
> and promising myself never to come back to that mad house.
>
> The worst part for me is to realize that I was mostly on the side of the
> backseat drivers :-(
>
>
>         Stefan
>
>
>