From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philipp Stephani
> From: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2016 19:16:37 +0000
> Cc: larsi@gnus.org= , johnw@gnu.org,= emacs-devel@gnu.o= rg
>
> This is probably for practical purposes (no point in showing thousands= of "CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-xyz"
> completions). For a character escape these considerations don't ap= ply, and it would be very surprising and
> confusing to not accept all characters.
The only characters that ucs-names omits are CJK ideographs, whose
codepoints can be computed from the name algorithmically.=C2=A0 All the
others are non-characters, right?=C2=A0 So why it won't be a good idea = to
simply use ucs-names?