From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philipp Stephani Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dynamic loading progress Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 00:08:44 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87io5bv1it.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87egfzuwca.fsf@lifelogs.com> <876118u6f2.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8737w3qero.fsf@lifelogs.com> <831tbn9g9j.fsf@gnu.org> <878u5upw7o.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83ziya8xph.fsf@gnu.org> <83y4du80xo.fsf@gnu.org> <837fld6lps.fsf@gnu.org> <83610w5o97.fsf@gnu.org> <564FACF5.2080601@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114b07d43a8b48052501cc8d X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448064545 8523 80.91.229.3 (21 Nov 2015 00:09:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 00:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: aurelien.aptel+emacs@gmail.com, tzz@lifelogs.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 21 01:09:04 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zzvji-0002aQ-JR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2015 01:09:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50467 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zzvjh-0008OH-Vt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 19:09:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54034) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zzvje-0008N9-Cx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 19:08:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zzvjd-0001Mn-Kt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 19:08:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]:37169) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zzvjc-0001Ma-09; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 19:08:56 -0500 Original-Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so40373271wmw.0; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 16:08:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=F55t/qUwh7YEUnZiEog2Ntm2WS2hSigsjJvMgZBNJ/M=; b=BWSshpAhwqi0sm++2Lz3ANuDUbGcodIM+4Ty9z52b9hrXzBEyWcuXTkTbIXdkeTASZ 60zfO9a1WUJ/1o7JUJNRXwfKxlX/sTt6KwC4uojrE3X4AZ4HjWd1PcSWPJ3a1BCWMGgr HTuIWaH4PBJ+gtyVANWM5XgXcL+/uKPysfW2O80HX0pPm1arksH0RWfbSKui4mzh3VYO 7q4Iv0pQrDMuzuc18/9jOmjJtRApkQR/bUFU93a6mv1tR7at6lepfSJNTMEXcVY/Yxa4 UFgyfmhBRpN2w7zzjPprdhXBN3CwFV14IxtHpnWI4fRK5dIoHWPQKKauOuAgZL5R5UuR Y1aQ== X-Received: by 10.28.187.4 with SMTP id l4mr2593408wmf.33.1448064535135; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 16:08:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <564FACF5.2080601@cs.ucla.edu> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::231 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194915 Archived-At: --001a114b07d43a8b48052501cc8d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Paul Eggert schrieb am Sa., 21. Nov. 2015 um 00:29 Uhr: > Philipp Stephani wrote: > > why does it need to detect anything? Can't it just be a different > > function that doesn't signal, similar to push_handler and > > push_handler_nosignal? > > Yes, that should work and should be easy to implement. But how would it > behave > to the caller? Will the caller have to check that it doesn't return NULL? > I hope > not; that would be a pain and error-prone. > Why, that's how malloc also behaves. --001a114b07d43a8b48052501cc8d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Paul E= ggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> = schrieb am Sa., 21. Nov. 2015 um 00:29=C2=A0Uhr:
Philipp Stephani wrote:
> why does it need to detect anything? Can't it just be a different<= br> > function that doesn't signal, similar to push_handler and
> push_handler_nosignal?

Yes, that should work and should be easy to implement. But how would it beh= ave
to the caller? Will the caller have to check that it doesn't return NUL= L? I hope
not; that would be a pain and error-prone.

<= div>Why, that's how malloc also behaves.=C2=A0
--001a114b07d43a8b48052501cc8d--