Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> schrieb am Sa., 21. Nov. 2015 um 00:29 Uhr:

> Philipp Stephani wrote:
> > why does it need to detect anything? Can't it just be a different
> > function that doesn't signal, similar to push_handler and
> > push_handler_nosignal?
>
> Yes, that should work and should be easy to implement. But how would it
> behave
> to the caller? Will the caller have to check that it doesn't return NULL?
> I hope
> not; that would be a pain and error-prone.
>

Why, that's how malloc also behaves.