From: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Should mode commands be idempotent?
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 20:49:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAArVCkTRBdJ=k4prpm184+sAgnDrmjZuK1s8QsjMdW_Xq5QGmg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwv7ew5cvj5.fsf-monnier+gmane.emacs.devel@gnu.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 446 bytes --]
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> schrieb am So., 8. Okt. 2017 um
21:05 Uhr:
> > +@item
> > +Calling the major mode command twice in direct succession should not
> > +fail and should do the same thing as calling the command only once.
>
> I think I'd prefer it if the word "idempotent" was mentioned (not
> *instead* of what you have, but additionally).
>
> Other than that: LGTM.
>
>
Thanks, added and pushed to emacs-26 as 798f07f150.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 787 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-21 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-19 19:58 Should mode commands be idempotent? Philipp Stephani
2017-09-19 22:10 ` Clément Pit-Claudel
2017-09-19 22:29 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-09-20 7:24 ` Clément Pit-Claudel
2017-09-20 14:52 ` John Wiegley
2017-09-20 22:30 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-09-20 23:05 ` Drew Adams
2017-10-08 15:09 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-09-20 22:25 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-09-23 8:16 ` Clément Pit-Claudel
2017-09-23 14:17 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-09-23 20:37 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-09-19 22:58 ` Drew Adams
2017-09-20 3:10 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-09-20 17:52 ` Drew Adams
2017-09-21 1:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-09-21 5:22 ` Drew Adams
2017-09-21 18:28 ` Richard Stallman
[not found] ` <<9f11a3c6-b113-4bf6-9dab-f894b2ad77b5@default>
[not found] ` <<E1dv6D1-0006Jr-Fl@fencepost.gnu.org>
2017-09-22 15:54 ` Drew Adams
2017-09-23 0:39 ` Richard Stallman
2017-09-23 8:05 ` Clément Pit-Claudel
2017-09-24 17:26 ` Drew Adams
2017-09-25 7:03 ` Clément Pit-Claudel
2017-09-25 13:57 ` Drew Adams
2017-09-26 0:36 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-09-26 3:30 ` John Wiegley
2017-09-26 17:55 ` Drew Adams
2017-09-26 18:01 ` John Wiegley
2017-09-26 18:50 ` Drew Adams
2017-09-26 18:54 ` John Wiegley
2017-10-08 15:28 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-10-08 19:04 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-10-10 2:10 ` John Wiegley
2017-12-21 20:49 ` Philipp Stephani [this message]
2017-12-22 2:20 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-10-10 23:15 ` Herring, Davis
[not found] ` <<E1dvYUB-0007na-Mx@fencepost.gnu.org>
2017-09-24 17:26 ` Drew Adams
2017-09-25 22:06 ` Richard Stallman
2017-09-19 23:50 ` John Wiegley
2017-09-20 3:09 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-09-20 13:01 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAArVCkTRBdJ=k4prpm184+sAgnDrmjZuK1s8QsjMdW_Xq5QGmg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=p.stephani2@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).