Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> schrieb am Mo., 21. Dez. 2015 um 20:00 Uhr:

> > Cc: aurelien.aptel+emacs@gmail.com, p.stephani2@gmail.com,
> tzz@lifelogs.com,
> >  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> > From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>
> > Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:28:09 -0800
> >
> > IMHO, we should treat OOM exactly like other sorts of error. It's
> > dangerous to make some functions infallible.
>
> We do: we signal an error.
>

For heap allocation failures, yes, but I think not for stack overflows.
(And I think handling stack overflows is much harder, so I guess most
people don't bother trying.)