John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com> schrieb am So., 23. Apr. 2017 um
08:14 Uhr:

> >>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> EZ> I don't think I understand this. From my POV, restricting modules to be
> EZ> called only from one thread is too restrictive, and I see no reason for
> EZ> that.
>
> I see Eli's point here; I'm wondering Philipp, did you run into a
> particular
> problem your patch is trying to solve, or are you trying to preempt future
> problems?
>
>
The particular problems I'm trying to solve are:
- With multithreading, the current thread check (that only checks for the
main thread) is clearly incorrect and I wanted to fix it.
- I finally wanted to start writing some documentation about the module
API. For that, I need to know both its desired and actual behavior,
including preconditions, guarantees, and restrictions.