Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no> schrieb am So., 8. Nov. 2015 um 13:51 Uhr:

> >>>>> Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>:
>
> > Would you prefer this as one big patch, or as several smaller ones? A big
> > patch would make it easier to see the code in context, but splitting it
> up
> > might increase review speed.
>
> Unless you have done strange rebasing on your git branch, but instead
> used plain merges, then I would suggest doing a git merge instead of
> using patches.
>

Fine with me, though that will likely produce lots of 'noise' commits
because we weren't particularly strict about history cleanliness.